These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9068968)

  • 1. Multiparous species present problems (and possibilities) to developmentalists.
    Zorrilla EP
    Dev Psychobiol; 1997 Mar; 30(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 9068968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Principles and pitfalls in the analysis of prenatal treatment effects in multiparous species.
    Holson RR; Pearce B
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 1992; 14(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 1635542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Summaries for patients. Reporting on statistical methods to adjust for confounding.
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jan; 136(2):I47. PubMed ID: 11928736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical considerations on the design, execution and analysis of developmental neurotoxicity studies to be published in Neurotoxicology and Teratology.
    Maurissen J
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2010; 32(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 19755149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Error message.
    Vaux DL
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):799. PubMed ID: 15103350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reporting on statistical methods to adjust for confounding: a cross-sectional survey.
    Müllner M; Matthews H; Altman DG
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jan; 136(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 11790063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of statistical procedures used in papers in the Australian Veterinary Journal.
    McCance I
    Aust Vet J; 1995 Sep; 72(9):322-8. PubMed ID: 8585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why most published research findings are false: problems in the analysis.
    Goodman S; Greenland S
    PLoS Med; 2007 Apr; 4(4):e168. PubMed ID: 17456002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical flaw trips up study of bad stats.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7110):379. PubMed ID: 17006479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical standards.
    Thompson J
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1992 Feb; 76(2):126. PubMed ID: 1739711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental toxicology: Issues of statistics, experimental design, and replication.
    Briner W; Kirwan J
    Neurotoxicology; 2017 Jan; 58():137-142. PubMed ID: 27965035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Double check casts doubt on statistics in published papers.
    Pearson H
    Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):490. PubMed ID: 15175712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Checklists work to improve science.
    Nature; 2018 Apr; 556(7701):273-274. PubMed ID: 30967653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A note on statistical and biological communication: a case study of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.
    Recoskie J; Heffernan JM; Jankowski HK
    BMC Res Notes; 2014 Dec; 7():939. PubMed ID: 25526663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The importance of analysis in published evidence levels].
    Bernardo WM
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2011; 57(1):1. PubMed ID: 21390444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and statistical methods in studies using animal models of development.
    Festing MF
    ILAR J; 2006; 47(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 16391426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Issues of design and analysis relating to the use of multiparous species in developmental nutritional studies.
    Wainwright PE
    J Nutr; 1998 Mar; 128(3):661-3. PubMed ID: 9482778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DNA microarrays: vital statistics.
    Tilstone C
    Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):610-2. PubMed ID: 12904757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to ensure your paper is rejected by the statistical reviewer.
    Stratton IM; Neil A
    Diabet Med; 2005 Apr; 22(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 15787658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical methodologies and incidence of appropriate statistical testing in orthopaedic spine literature. Are statistics misleading?
    Vrbos LA; Lorenz MA; Peabody EH; McGregor M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Jun; 18(8):1021-9. PubMed ID: 8367770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.