These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9069629)

  • 1. Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    McDermott HJ; McKay CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1622-31. PubMed ID: 9069629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intonation of musical intervals by musical intervals by deaf subjects stimulated with single bipolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Pijl S; Schwarz DW
    Hear Res; 1995 Sep; 89(1-2):203-11. PubMed ID: 8600127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes.
    Pijl S; Schwarz DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Aug; 98(2 Pt 1):886-95. PubMed ID: 7642827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
    Gfeller K; Turner C; Oleson J; Zhang X; Gantz B; Froman R; Olszewski C
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
    Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.
    Boëx C; Baud L; Cosendai G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
    Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time.
    Reiss LA; Turner CW; Erenberg SR; Gantz BJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):241-57. PubMed ID: 17347777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants.
    Laneau J; Wouters J; Moonen M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(1):38-52. PubMed ID: 16219993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Musical pitch perception with pulsatile stimulation of single electrodes in patients implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pijl S
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():224-7. PubMed ID: 7668647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulating the effects of spread of electric excitation on musical tuning and melody identification with a cochlear implant.
    Spahr AJ; Litvak LM; Dorman MF; Bohanan AR; Mishra LN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1599-606. PubMed ID: 18664681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear Implant Rate Pitch and Melody Perception as a Function of Place and Number of Electrodes.
    Marimuthu V; Swanson BA; Mannell R
    Trends Hear; 2016 Apr; 20():. PubMed ID: 27094028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating cochlear implant place-pitch perception with the Modified Melodies test.
    Swanson B; Dawson P; McDermott H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2009; 10 Suppl 1():100-4. PubMed ID: 19148894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Chen JK; Chuang AY; McMahon C; Hsieh JC; Tung TH; Li LP
    Pediatrics; 2010 Apr; 125(4):e793-800. PubMed ID: 20211951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental assessment of polyphonic tones with cochlear implants.
    Penninger RT; Limb CJ; Vermeire K; Leman M; Dhooge I
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1267-71. PubMed ID: 23921943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electro-acoustic pitch matching experiments in patients with single-sided deafness and a cochlear implant: Is there a need for adjustment of the default frequency allocation tables?
    Peters JPM; Bennink E; Grolman W; van Zanten GA
    Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():124-133. PubMed ID: 27789255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects.
    Townshend B; Cotter N; Van Compernolle D; White RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 3624633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency-place map for electrical stimulation in cochlear implants: Change over time.
    Vermeire K; Landsberger DM; Van de Heyning PH; Voormolen M; Kleine Punte A; Schatzer R; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2015 Aug; 326():8-14. PubMed ID: 25840373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.