BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9070526)

  • 1. A biomechanical study of replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament with a graft. Part 1: Isometry, pre-tension of the graft, and anterior-posterior laxity.
    Markolf KL; Slauterbeck JR; Armstrong KL; Shapiro MS; Finerman GA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Mar; 79(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 9070526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical consequences of replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with a patellar ligament allograft. Part I: insertion of the graft and anterior-posterior testing.
    Markolf KL; Burchfield DM; Shapiro MM; Davis BR; Finerman GA; Slauterbeck JL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Nov; 78(11):1720-7. PubMed ID: 8934488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A biomechanical study of replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament with a graft. Part II: Forces in the graft compared with forces in the intact ligament.
    Markolf KL; Slauterbeck JR; Armstrong KL; Shapiro MS; Finerman GA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Mar; 79(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 9070527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical consequences of replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with a patellar ligament allograft. Part II: forces in the graft compared with forces in the intact ligament.
    Markolf KL; Burchfield DM; Shapiro MM; Cha CW; Finerman GA; Slauterbeck JL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Nov; 78(11):1728-34. PubMed ID: 8934489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reconstruction of knees with combined cruciate deficiencies: a biomechanical study.
    Markolf KL; O'Neill G; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Sep; 85(9):1768-74. PubMed ID: 12954836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: graft pretension and knee laxity.
    McAllister DR; Markolf KL; Oakes DA; Young CR; McWilliams J
    Am J Sports Med; 2002; 30(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 12016068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Where should the femoral tunnel of a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction be placed to best restore anteroposterior laxity and ligament forces?
    Markolf KL; Feeley BT; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Apr; 34(4):604-11. PubMed ID: 16365374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of femoral tunnel separation.
    Markolf KL; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jun; 38(6):1141-6. PubMed ID: 20348284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of the angle of the femoral and tibial tunnels in the coronal plane and incremental excision of the posterior cruciate ligament on tension of an anterior cruciate ligament graft: an in vitro study.
    Simmons R; Howell SM; Hull ML
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jun; 85(6):1018-29. PubMed ID: 12783997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of notchplasty and femoral tunnel position on excursion patterns of an anterior cruciate ligament graft.
    Hame SL; Markolf KL; Hunter DM; Oakes DA; Zoric B
    Arthroscopy; 2003 Apr; 19(4):340-5. PubMed ID: 12671615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of femoral tunnel placement on knee laxity and forces in an anterior cruciate ligament graft.
    Markolf KL; Hame S; Hunter DM; Oakes DA; Zoric B; Gause P; Finerman GA
    J Orthop Res; 2002 Sep; 20(5):1016-24. PubMed ID: 12382968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Analysis of graft forces.
    Oakes DA; Markolf KL; McWilliams J; Young CR; McAllister DR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Jun; 84(6):938-44. PubMed ID: 12063327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of femoral tunnel position and graft tensioning technique on posterior laxity of the posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee.
    Burns WC; Draganich LF; Pyevich M; Reider B
    Am J Sports Med; 1995; 23(4):424-30. PubMed ID: 7573651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical studies of double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.
    Markolf KL; Feeley BT; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1788-94. PubMed ID: 16882903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical comparison between the rectangular-tunnel and the round-tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures with a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.
    Suzuki T; Shino K; Otsubo H; Suzuki D; Mae T; Fujimiya M; Yamashita T; Fujie H
    Arthroscopy; 2014 Oct; 30(10):1294-302. PubMed ID: 25064752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of femoral attachment location on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: graft tension patterns and restoration of normal anterior-posterior laxity patterns.
    Zavras TD; Race A; Amis AA
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2005 Mar; 13(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 15756613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Popliteus bypass and popliteofibular ligament reconstructions reduce posterior tibial translations and forces in a posterior cruciate ligament graft.
    Markolf KL; Graves BR; Sigward SM; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
    Arthroscopy; 2007 May; 23(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 17478278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Mapping of Isometric Posterior Cruciate Ligament Attachment Sites on the Tibia and Femur: Single- Versus Double-Bundle Analysis.
    Forsythe B; Patel BH; Lansdown DA; Agarwalla A; Kunze KN; Lu Y; Puzzitiello RN; Verma NN; Cole BJ; LaPrade R; Inoue N; Chahla J
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Nov; 36(11):2875-2884. PubMed ID: 32554074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro study of knee stability after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Pearsall AW 4TH ; Pyevich M; Draganich LF; Larkin JJ; Reider B
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Jun; (327):264-71. PubMed ID: 8641073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anterior-posterior and rotatory stability of single and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.
    Markolf KL; Park S; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jan; 91(1):107-18. PubMed ID: 19122085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.