429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9070527)
1. A biomechanical study of replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament with a graft. Part II: Forces in the graft compared with forces in the intact ligament.
Markolf KL; Slauterbeck JR; Armstrong KL; Shapiro MS; Finerman GA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Mar; 79(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 9070527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical study of replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament with a graft. Part 1: Isometry, pre-tension of the graft, and anterior-posterior laxity.
Markolf KL; Slauterbeck JR; Armstrong KL; Shapiro MS; Finerman GA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Mar; 79(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 9070526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical consequences of replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with a patellar ligament allograft. Part II: forces in the graft compared with forces in the intact ligament.
Markolf KL; Burchfield DM; Shapiro MM; Cha CW; Finerman GA; Slauterbeck JL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Nov; 78(11):1728-34. PubMed ID: 8934489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical consequences of replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with a patellar ligament allograft. Part I: insertion of the graft and anterior-posterior testing.
Markolf KL; Burchfield DM; Shapiro MM; Davis BR; Finerman GA; Slauterbeck JL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Nov; 78(11):1720-7. PubMed ID: 8934488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct in vitro measurement of forces in the cruciate ligaments. Part I: The effect of multiplane loading in the intact knee.
Wascher DC; Markolf KL; Shapiro MS; Finerman GA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1993 Mar; 75(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 8444916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How well do anatomical reconstructions of the posterolateral corner restore varus stability to the posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee?
Markolf KL; Graves BR; Sigward SM; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
Am J Sports Med; 2007 Jul; 35(7):1117-22. PubMed ID: 17581975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reconstruction of knees with combined cruciate deficiencies: a biomechanical study.
Markolf KL; O'Neill G; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Sep; 85(9):1768-74. PubMed ID: 12954836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct measurement of resultant forces in the anterior cruciate ligament. An in vitro study performed with a new experimental technique.
Markolf KL; Gorek JF; Kabo JM; Shapiro MS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1990 Apr; 72(4):557-67. PubMed ID: 2324143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Analysis of graft forces.
Oakes DA; Markolf KL; McWilliams J; Young CR; McAllister DR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Jun; 84(6):938-44. PubMed ID: 12063327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct in vitro measurement of forces in the cruciate ligaments. Part II: The effect of section of the posterolateral structures.
Markolf KL; Wascher DC; Finerman GA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1993 Mar; 75(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 8444917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of stability of the knee and ligament force after implantation of a synthetic anterior cruciate ligament. In vitro measurement.
More RC; Markolf KL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1988 Aug; 70(7):1020-31. PubMed ID: 3403570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anterior-posterior and rotatory stability of single and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.
Markolf KL; Park S; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jan; 91(1):107-18. PubMed ID: 19122085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posterior cruciate ligament graft fixation angles, part 1: biomechanical evaluation for anatomic single-bundle reconstruction.
Kennedy NI; LaPrade RF; Goldsmith MT; Faucett SC; Rasmussen MT; Coatney GA; Engebretsen L; Wijdicks CA
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Oct; 42(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 25091117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Posterior cruciate ligament graft fixation angles, part 2: biomechanical evaluation for anatomic double-bundle reconstruction.
Kennedy NI; LaPrade RF; Goldsmith MT; Faucett SC; Rasmussen MT; Coatney GA; Engebretsen L; Wijdicks CA
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Oct; 42(10):2346-55. PubMed ID: 25091116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Popliteus bypass and popliteofibular ligament reconstructions reduce posterior tibial translations and forces in a posterior cruciate ligament graft.
Markolf KL; Graves BR; Sigward SM; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
Arthroscopy; 2007 May; 23(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 17478278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of posterolateral reconstructions on external tibial rotation and forces in a posterior cruciate ligament graft.
Markolf KL; Graves BR; Sigward SM; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Nov; 89(11):2351-8. PubMed ID: 17974876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical studies of double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.
Markolf KL; Feeley BT; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1788-94. PubMed ID: 16882903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of tibial positioning on the diagnosis of posterolateral rotatory instability in the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee.
Strauss EJ; Ishak C; Inzerillo C; Walsh M; Yildirim G; Walker P; Jazrawi L; Rosen J
Br J Sports Med; 2007 Aug; 41(8):481-5; discussion 485. PubMed ID: 17261553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Limits of movement in the human knee. Effect of sectioning the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral structures.
Grood ES; Stowers SF; Noyes FR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1988 Jan; 70(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 3335577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of combined knee loadings on posterior cruciate ligament force generation.
Markolf KL; Slauterbeck JL; Armstrong KL; Shapiro MM; Finerman GA
J Orthop Res; 1996 Jul; 14(4):633-8. PubMed ID: 8764874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
