These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9070711)

  • 1. Oocyte donation in Turner's syndrome: an analysis of the factors affecting the outcome.
    Khastgir G; Abdalla H; Thomas A; Korea L; Latarche L; Studd J
    Hum Reprod; 1997 Feb; 12(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 9070711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patients with Turner's syndrome may have an inherent endometrial abnormality affecting receptivity in oocyte donation.
    Yaron Y; Ochshorn Y; Amit A; Yovel I; Kogosowki A; Lessing JB
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jun; 65(6):1249-52. PubMed ID: 8641509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endometrial preparation: effect of estrogen dose and administration route on reproductive outcomes in oocyte donation cycles with fresh embryo transfer.
    Madero S; Rodriguez A; Vassena R; Vernaeve V
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1755-64. PubMed ID: 27141040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Turner's syndrome and pregnancies after oocyte donation.
    Foudila T; Söderström-Anttila V; Hovatta O
    Hum Reprod; 1999 Feb; 14(2):532-5. PubMed ID: 10100005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Turner's syndrome and oocyte donation].
    Delbaere A; Englert Y
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2002 Dec; 30(12):970-8. PubMed ID: 12661287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of donor sperm in addition to oocyte donation after repeated implantation failure in normozoospermic patients does not improve live birth rates.
    Blázquez A; García D; Rodríguez A; Vassena R; Vernaeve V
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2549-2553. PubMed ID: 27609983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.
    Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
    Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcome of ovum donation in Turner's syndrome patients.
    Press F; Shapiro HM; Cowell CA; Oliver GD
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Nov; 64(5):995-8. PubMed ID: 7589649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pregnancy outcome after oocyte donation in patients with Turner's syndrome and partial X monosomy.
    Alvaro Mercadal B; Imbert R; Demeestere I; Englert Y; Delbaere A
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Aug; 26(8):2061-8. PubMed ID: 21646279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oocyte donation in patients with Turner's syndrome: a successful technique but with an accompanying high risk of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy.
    Bodri D; Vernaeve V; Figueras F; Vidal R; Guillén JJ; Coll O
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Mar; 21(3):829-32. PubMed ID: 16311294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the mechanism for higher pregnancy rates in donor oocyte recipients by comparison of fresh with frozen embryo transfer pregnancy rates in a shared oocyte programme.
    Check JH; O'Shaughnessy A; Lurie D; Fisher C; Adelson HG
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):3022-7. PubMed ID: 8747065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Endometrial preparation in oocyte recipients].
    Grzegorczyk-Martin V; Mayenga JM; Kulski O; Belaid Y; Grefenstette I; Belaisch-Allart J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Sep; 40(9):507-10. PubMed ID: 22906698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endometrial thickness and serum oestradiol concentrations as predictors of outcome in oocyte donation.
    Remohí J; Ardiles G; García-Velasco JA; Gaitán P; Simón C; Pellicer A
    Hum Reprod; 1997 Oct; 12(10):2271-6. PubMed ID: 9402294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical experience employing co-culture of human embryos with autologous human endometrial epithelial cells.
    Rubio C; Simón C; Mercader A; Garcia-Velasco J; Remohí J; Pellicer A
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Dec; 15 Suppl 6():31-8. PubMed ID: 11261481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Freeze-all, oocyte vitrification, or fresh embryo transfer? Lessons from an egg-sharing donation program.
    Braga DP; Setti AS; Figueira RC; Azevedo Mde C; Iaconelli A; Lo Turco EG; Borges E
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 27262501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The presence of multiple gestational sacs confers a higher live birth rate in women with infertility who achieve a positive pregnancy test after fresh and frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective local cohort.
    Balassiano E; Malik S; Vaid P; Knochenhauer ES; Traub ML
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2014 Nov; 12():104. PubMed ID: 25422171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recipient's age does not adversely affect pregnancy outcome after oocyte donation.
    Legro RS; Wong IL; Paulson RJ; Lobo RA; Sauer MV
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 172(1 Pt 1):96-100. PubMed ID: 7847566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.