195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9070774)
1. Does "monitor the patients" mean constantly?: $1.5 million verdict. Case in point: Adams v. Cooper Hospital 684 A. 2d 506--NJ (1996).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1997 Jan; 37(8):2. PubMed ID: 9070774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Failure to adequately "monitor": $1.5 million dollar verdict. Case on point: Adams v. Cooper Hospital. 684 A. 2d 506--NJ (1996).
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1998 Feb; 38(9):2. PubMed ID: 10067607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. RN removed FHR monitor to make room: $3.8 million verdict. CASE ON POINT: Long v. Wader, 2007 ALSC 1041887--08/31/07) So.2d-AL.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Jan; 48(8):2. PubMed ID: 18330376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nurses fail to listen to patient's complaints. Case in point: Harmon v. Patel 617 N.E. 2d 183--IL (1993).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Oct; 34(5):2. PubMed ID: 8248493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Nurse fails to chart call to doctor. Case in point: Morse v. Flint River Comm. Hosp. 450 S.E.2d 253--GA (1994).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Jan; 35(8):2. PubMed ID: 7886195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "Duty to protect" is bar to contributory negligence defense. Case in point: Robia v. Cooper Medical Center 643 A. 1d 1--NJ (1994).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Sep; 35(4):4. PubMed ID: 7972847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Nurses failed to 'advocate' for their patient. Case on point: Rowe v. Sisters of Pallottine Missionary Society, 2001 WL 1585453 s.e.2d -WV.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jan; 42(8):2. PubMed ID: 15301071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Doctor "shocks" nurse: $1.2 million verdict.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Apr; 33(11):1. PubMed ID: 8493320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Suit alleging RNs & MDs responsible for brain injury to newborn dismissed. Case on point: C.A. v. Bentolila, A-1261-11T1 NJSUP (8/9/2012)-NJ.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 Aug; 53(3):4. PubMed ID: 22997684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Recovery room nurse fails to monitor patient. Case in point: Eyoma v. Falco (589 A. 2d 653--NJ 1991).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Jul; 32(2):2. PubMed ID: 1876705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Wrong meds & death on "life flight": jurisdictional issues. Case in point: Cowart v. Shelby County. Health Care Corp. 911F. Supp. 248--MS (1996).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Mar; 36(10):4. PubMed ID: 8711112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Unknown nurse" injects patient with dirty needle. Case in point: Stegmeier v. St. Elizabeth Hosp. (571 A. 2d 1006--NJ (1990)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Jun; 31(1):2. PubMed ID: 2371407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient's legs broken during transfer: $1.25 million verdict. Case on point: rehabilitation facility at Austin v. Cooper 962 S.W. 2d 151--TX (1998).
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1998 May; 38(12):4. PubMed ID: 10067635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Nursing and the law. Witness to battery?
Langslow A
Aust Nurs J; 1993 Aug; 1(2):35-7. PubMed ID: 8261047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Georgia Supreme Court affirmed 'gross negligence' standard Case on point: Gliemmo v. Cousineau, SO9A1807 (3/15/2010) So.2d-GA.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Mar; 50(10):4. PubMed ID: 20499621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Nurse "fails to recall": blockbuster judgment. Case in point: Salas v. Wang (846 F. 2d 897--NJ 1988).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Aug; 29(3):2. PubMed ID: 3413281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mystery nurse reports child's sexually transmitted disease in error. Case in point: Perez v. Bay Area Hospital (829 P. Rptr. 2d 700--OR [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jul; 33(2):4. PubMed ID: 1509091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgeon not liable for CRNA: no "borrowed servant". Case in point: Harris V. Miller 438 S. E. 2d 731 NC (1994).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Mar; 34(10):2. PubMed ID: 8184088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Failure to chart that Dr. was notified of pt.'s deterioration. Case in point: Sweeney v. Purvis 665 So. 2d 926--AL (1995).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Mar; 36(10):2. PubMed ID: 8711110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Lap pad left in patient: is nurse or doctor responsible? Case in point: Ravi v. Coates 662 So. 2d 218-AL (1995).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jan; 36(8):2. PubMed ID: 8711123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
