These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9070774)

  • 21. May you delay implementing Dr.'s orders? Case in point: Koeniguer v. Eckrich (422 N.W. 2d 600--SD (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jul; 29(2):2. PubMed ID: 3406422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Physicians retract opinion: nurses not negligent. Case in point: Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. (583 So. 2d 1169--LA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):4. PubMed ID: 1763180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nursing negligence not "superceding" cause of death. Case in point: Dent v. Perkins 629 So. 2d 1354--LA (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Apr; 34(11):4. PubMed ID: 8184094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nurse peer review records not totally privileged. Case on point: Adams v. St. Francis Regional Med. Ctr., 955 P.2d 1169-KS (1998).
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1998 Jul; 39(2):4. PubMed ID: 10067615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is there a nurse-patient privilege? Case in point: Roberson by Isaac v. Liu (555 N.E. 2d 999--IL (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Sep; 31(4):2. PubMed ID: 2217817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is your patient complaining of "pain" or "burning"? Case in point: McLain v. Glenwood Reg. Medical Center (601 S.E. 2d 240--LA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Oct; 33(5):4. PubMed ID: 1454995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nurses fail to "go over doctor's head": death results. Case in point: Strubhart v. Perry Mem. Hosp. Trus 903 P. 2d 263--OK (a995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Nov; 36(6):4. PubMed ID: 8552757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Court holds "charting by exception" policy negligent. Case in point: Lama v. Borras 16F. 2d 473 PR (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 May; 34(12):2. PubMed ID: 7517052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Liability for failure to spot inconsistency in orders. Case in point: St. Germain v. Pfeifer 637 N.E.2d 848 MA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Sep; 35(4):2. PubMed ID: 7972845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. I.V. push of vesicants causes extravasation. Case on point: Iacano v. St. Peter's Medical Center, 334 N.J. Super. 547--NJ (2000).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Nov; 41(6):2. PubMed ID: 11995003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Who has responsibility to monitor O.R. blood loss? Case in point: Uhr v. Lutheran General Hospital (589 N.E.2d 723--IL [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):2. PubMed ID: 1410393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reversible error results in new trial for RN. Case on point: Winter v. Henderson, A-215-10T3 NJSUP (2/22/2012)-NJ.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 May; 52(12):2. PubMed ID: 22679663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Is R.N. practice of medicine negligence per se? Case in point: Turek v. Elizabeth Com. Health Ctr (488 N.W. 2d 567--NE [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):2. PubMed ID: 1302862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does judgment for nurse require judgment for hospital? Case in point: Eversole v. Oklahoma Hosp. Founders (818 P. 2d. 456--OK (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Feb; 32(9):4. PubMed ID: 1565799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Legal case briefs for nurses. AL.: nursing protocols excluded in death case: reversible error issue; AL.: E.R. nurse toe tags wrong bodies: can nurse rely on police identification?
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Mar; 32(10):3. PubMed ID: 1594771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Can doctors rely on nurses' sponge counts? Case in point: Van Hook v. Anderson (824 P. 2d 509--WA (1992)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Apr; 32(11):2. PubMed ID: 1603936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Failure to file suit timely: doctrine of Contra Non Valentem. Case in point: Wimberly v. Schumpert Med. Center 641 So. 2d 1016--LA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Dec; 35(7):4. PubMed ID: 7838973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. "Asleep on duty" record impacts delay in delivery case. Case in point: St. Paul Medical Center v. Cecil (842 S.W.2d 808--TX [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Mar; 33(10):2. PubMed ID: 8493317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Failure to determine breech position: M.D. or R.N. duty? Case in point: Alvis v. Henderson Obstetrics, S.C. (592 N.E.2d 678--[1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):4. PubMed ID: 1410395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.