These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9071101)

  • 21. Low-dose fentanyl-midazolam combination improves sevoflurane induction in adults.
    Lesage S; Drolet P; Donati F; Racine S; Fortier LP; Audy D
    Can J Anaesth; 2009 Oct; 56(10):733-9. PubMed ID: 19641980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Anesthesia induction in children: propofol in comparison with thiopental following premedication with midazolam].
    Piotrowski R; Petrow N
    Anaesthesist; 1990 Aug; 39(8):398-405. PubMed ID: 2221313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Co-administration of alfentanil-propofol improves laryngeal mask airway insertion compared to fentanyl-propofol.
    Hui JK; Critchley LA; Karmakar MK; Lam PK
    Can J Anaesth; 2002 May; 49(5):508-12. PubMed ID: 11983670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Does propofol have advantages over midazolam and isoflurane? Comparative study of 2 total intravenous anesthesia techniques using midazolam and propofol, versus balanced anesthesia with isoflurane].
    Monedero P; Carrascosa F; García-Pedrajas F; Panadero A; Hidalgo F; Arroyo JL
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 1994; 41(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 8059043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative evaluation of TIVA with propofol-fentanyl and thiopental-sevoflurane anesthesia using laryngeal mask airway for diagnostic bronchoscopy.
    Yamaguchi S; Koguchi T; Midorikawa Y; Okuda Y; Kitajima T
    J Anesth; 1998 Jun; 12(2):53-56. PubMed ID: 28921243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Atropine-induced heart rate changes: a comparison between midazolam-fentanyl-propofol-N2O and midazolam-fentanyl-thiopentone-enflurane-N2O anaesthesia.
    Cross G; Gaylard D; Lim M
    Can J Anaesth; 1990 May; 37(4 Pt 1):416-9. PubMed ID: 2340610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Haemodynamic comparison of propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia with midazolam-fentanyl anaesthesia in CABG patients without preoperative heart failure.
    Kubota T; Hirota K; Yoshida H; Yatsu Y; Maeda A; Matsuki A
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2000; 51(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 11129620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fentanyl dose for the insertion of Classic Laryngeal Mask Airways in non-paralysed patients induced with propofol 2.5 mg/kg.
    Tan AS; Wang CY
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2010 Jan; 38(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 20191779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Randomized double-blind comparison of ketamine-propofol, fentanyl-propofol and propofol-saline on haemodynamics and laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions.
    Goh PK; Chiu CL; Wang CY; Chan YK; Loo PL
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2005 Apr; 33(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 15960405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The A-line ARX index may be a more sensitive detector of arousal than the bispectral index during propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia: a preliminary investigation.
    Nishiyama T; Hanaoka K
    Can J Anaesth; 2004; 51(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 15197114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Remifentanil vs fentanyl with a target controlled propofol infusion in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial lesions.
    Del Gaudio A; Ciritella P; Perrotta F; Puopolo M; Lauta E; Mastronardi P; De Vivo P
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2006 May; 72(5):309-19. PubMed ID: 16675939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of midazolam-fentanyl and thiopental-fentanyl combinations in the induction of general anesthesia].
    Pomane C; Paulin M; Léna P; Blache JL; François G
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 1983; 2(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 6625248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of dexmedetomidine-propofol vs. fentanyl-propofol for laryngeal mask insertion.
    Uzümcügil F; Canbay O; Celebi N; Karagoz AH; Ozgen S
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Aug; 25(8):675-80. PubMed ID: 18400141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Co-maintenance with propofol and midazolam: sympathoadrenergic reactions, hemodynamic effects, stress response, EEG and recovery].
    Adams HA; Hermsen M; Kirchhoff K; Bornscheuer A; Hecker H
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2002 Jun; 37(6):333-40. PubMed ID: 12063586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Comparison of propofol and pentazocine combined with thiamylal for laryngeal mask insertion].
    Okuyama M; Nakamura I
    Masui; 1998 Nov; 47(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 9852694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Propofol or sevoflurane for laryngeal mask airway insertion.
    Molloy ME; Buggy DJ; Scanlon P
    Can J Anaesth; 1999 Apr; 46(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 10232714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Comparative study of 3 techniques for total intravenous anesthesia: midazolam-ketamine, propofol-ketamine, and propofol-fentanyl].
    Hernández C; Parramón F; García-Velasco P; Vilaplana J; García C; Villalonga A
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 1999 Apr; 46(4):154-8. PubMed ID: 10365612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Increased dosage of propofol in anesthesia induction cannot control the patient's responses to insertion of a laryngeal mask airway.
    Kanazawa M; Nitta M; Murata T; Suzuki T
    Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 2006 Apr; 31(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 21302218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of anesthetic technique on the hemodynamic response and recovery profile in coronary revascularization patients.
    Mora CT; Dudek C; Torjman MC; White PF
    Anesth Analg; 1995 Nov; 81(5):900-10. PubMed ID: 7486076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Cardiovascular responses during laryngeal mask airway insertion in normotensive, hypertensive and chronic renal failure patients].
    Yamauchi M; Igarashi M; Tsunoda K; Edanaga M; Suzuki H; Tohdoh Y; Namiki A
    Masui; 1999 Aug; 48(8):868-73. PubMed ID: 10481421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.