These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9071313)
1. Factors influencing the accuracy of volume measurements in spiral CT: a phantom study. Van Hoe L; Haven F; Bellon E; Baert AL; Bosmans H; Feron M; Suetens P; Marchal G J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(2):332-8. PubMed ID: 9071313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of volume calculation formulae on volume estimation accuracy of different shaped objects: an in vitro ultrasound and CT study. Kodikara I; Gamage D; Abeysekara I; Ilayperuma I Acta Radiol; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1414-1420. PubMed ID: 32013542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated assessment of low contrast sensitivity for CT systems using a model observer. Hernandez-Giron I; Geleijns J; Calzado A; Veldkamp WJ Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38 Suppl 1():S25. PubMed ID: 21978115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning. Ekestubbe A Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can PET provide the 3D extent of tumor motion for individualized internal target volumes? A phantom study of the limitations of CT and the promise of PET. Caldwell CB; Mah K; Skinner M; Danjoux CE Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Apr; 55(5):1381-93. PubMed ID: 12654451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of liver volume using spiral CT and the curved line and cubic spline algorithms: reproducibility and interobserver variation. Sandrasegaran K; Kwo PW; DiGirolamo D; Stockberger SM; Cummings OW; Kopecky KK Abdom Imaging; 1999; 24(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 9933675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of factors associated with volumetric data errors in gamma knife radiosurgery. Yang DY; Sheehan J; Liu YS; ChangLai SP; Pan HC; Chen CJ; Chou MC Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2009; 87(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19039257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between a 2D channelized Hotelling observer and human observers in a low-contrast detection task with multislice reading in CT. Yu L; Chen B; Kofler JM; Favazza CP; Leng S; Kupinski MA; McCollough CH Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3990-3999. PubMed ID: 28555878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy. Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A gel tumour phantom for assessment of the accuracy of manual and automatic delineation of gross tumour volume from FDG-PET/CT. Skretting A; Evensen JF; Løndalen AM; Bogsrud TV; Glomset OK; Eilertsen K Acta Oncol; 2013 Apr; 52(3):636-44. PubMed ID: 23075421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flat panel detector-based volumetric computed tomography (fpVCT): performance evaluation of volumetric methods by using different phantoms in comparison to 64-multislice computed tomography. Obenauer S; Dullin C; Heuser M Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 17414524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of arterial plaque and lumen density with MDCT. Paul NS; Blobel J; Kashani H; Rice M; Ursani A Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4227-37. PubMed ID: 20879583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters. Prevrhal S; Engelke K; Kalender WA Phys Med Biol; 1999 Mar; 44(3):751-64. PubMed ID: 10211808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A phantom study of nodule size evaluation with chest tomosynthesis and computed tomography. Johnsson AA; Svalkvist A; Vikgren J; Boijsen M; Flinck A; Kheddache S; Båth M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 20133329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a dynamic flow imaging phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. Driscoll B; Keller H; Coolens C Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4866-80. PubMed ID: 21928658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new and validated CT-based method for the calculation of orbital soft tissue volumes. Regensburg NI; Kok PH; Zonneveld FW; Baldeschi L; Saeed P; Wiersinga WM; Mourits MP Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 May; 49(5):1758-62. PubMed ID: 18436810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scatter correction method for x-ray CT using primary modulation: phantom studies. Gao H; Fahrig R; Bennett NR; Sun M; Star-Lack J; Zhu L Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):934-46. PubMed ID: 20229902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving superficial target delineation in radiation therapy with endoscopic tracking and registration. Weersink RA; Qiu J; Hope AJ; Daly MJ; Cho BC; Dacosta RS; Sharpe MB; Breen SL; Chan H; Jaffray DA Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6458-68. PubMed ID: 22149829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PET-CT-based auto-contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. van Baardwijk A; Bosmans G; Boersma L; Buijsen J; Wanders S; Hochstenbag M; van Suylen RJ; Dekker A; Dehing-Oberije C; Houben R; Bentzen SM; van Kroonenburgh M; Lambin P; De Ruysscher D Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jul; 68(3):771-8. PubMed ID: 17398018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]