These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9071313)
21. An effective method to verify line and point spread functions measured in computed tomography. Ohkubo M; Wada S; Matsumoto T; Nishizawa K Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2757-64. PubMed ID: 16964851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A solid iodinated phantom material for use in tomographic x-ray imaging. Hill ML; Mainprize JG; Mawdsley GE; Yaffe MJ Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4409-20. PubMed ID: 19928071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reproducibility and accuracy of coronary calcium measurements with multi-detector row versus electron-beam CT. Kopp AF; Ohnesorge B; Becker C; Schröder S; Heuschmid M; Küttner A; Kuzo R; Claussen CD Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 12354993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantification accuracy for dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) CT imaging: phantom and quality assurance framework. Coolens C; Mohseni H; Dhodi S; Ma S; Keller H; Jaffray DA Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():192-198. PubMed ID: 30150044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Microcomputer-based technique for 3-D reconstruction and volume measurement of computer tomographic images. Part 1: Phantom studies. Albright RE; Fram EK Invest Radiol; 1988 Dec; 23(12):881-5. PubMed ID: 3203990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of z-axis resolution and image noise for nonconstant velocity spiral CT data reconstructed using a weighted 3D filtered backprojection (WFBP) reconstruction algorithm. Christner JA; Stierstorfer K; Primak AN; Eusemann CD; Flohr TG; McCollough CH Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):897-906. PubMed ID: 20229899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy in contouring of small and low contrast lesions: comparison between diagnostic quality computed tomography scanner and computed tomography simulation scanner-A phantom study. Ho YW; Wong WK; Yu SK; Lam WW; Geng H Med Dosim; 2012; 37(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 22626967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Effective dose in X-ray examinations: comparison between spiral CT and urography in the study of renal colic]. De Denaro M; Bregant P; Cupardo F; De Guarrini F; Rimondini A; Pozzi Mucelli R Radiol Med; 2001 Oct; 102(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 11740454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Low-contrast resolution in volumetric x-ray CT--analytical comparison between conventional and spiral CT. Wang G; Vannier MW Med Phys; 1997 Mar; 24(3):373-6. PubMed ID: 9089589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimation or quantification of tumour volume? CT study on irregular phantoms. Tiitola M; Kivisaari L; Tervahartiala P; Palomäki M; Kivisaari RP; Mankinen P; Vehmas T Acta Radiol; 2001 Jan; 42(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 11167341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Volumetry of low-contrast liver lesions with CT: Investigation of estimation uncertainties in a phantom study. Li Q; Liang Y; Huang Q; Zong M; Berman B; Gavrielides MA; Schwartz LH; Zhao B; Petrick N Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6608. PubMed ID: 27908157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing image quality and dose reduction of a new x-ray computed tomography iterative reconstruction algorithm using model observers. Tseng HW; Fan J; Kupinski MA; Sainath P; Hsieh J Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071910. PubMed ID: 24989388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Phantom Study Investigating the Accuracy of Manual and Automatic Image Fusion with the GE Logiq E9: Implications for use in Percutaneous Liver Interventions. Burgmans MC; den Harder JM; Meershoek P; van den Berg NS; Chan SXJM; van Leeuwen FWB; van Erkel AR Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2017 Jun; 40(6):914-923. PubMed ID: 28204959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Volumetric measurement of artificial pure ground-glass nodules at low-dose CT: Comparisons between hybrid iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection. Sakai N; Yabuuchi H; Kondo M; Kojima T; Nagatomo K; Kawanami S; Kamitani T; Yonezawa M; Nagao M; Honda H Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2654-62. PubMed ID: 26362824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Detection of low-contrast objects: experimental comparison of single- and multi-detector row CT with a phantom. Verdun FR; Denys A; Valley JF; Schnyder P; Meuli RA Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):426-31. PubMed ID: 11997548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy and reliability of thyroid volumetry using spiral CT and thyroid volume in a healthy, non-iodine-deficient Chinese adult population. Shu J; Zhao J; Guo D; Luo Y; Zhong W; Xie W Eur J Radiol; 2011 Feb; 77(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 19699597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Image artifact in dental cone-beam CT. Katsumata A; Hirukawa A; Noujeim M; Okumura S; Naitoh M; Fujishita M; Ariji E; Langlais RP Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):652-7. PubMed ID: 16632279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of CT-based thickness measurement of thin structures: modeling of limited spatial resolution in all three dimensions. Prevrhal S; Fox JC; Shepherd JA; Genant HK Med Phys; 2003 Jan; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12557971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Volumetric measurement pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules with multi-detector CT: effect of various tube current on measurement accuracy--a chest CT phantom study. Linning E; Daqing M Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):934-9. PubMed ID: 19409818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of the cone beam CT for internal target volume localization in lung stereotactic radiotherapy in comparison with 4D MIP images. Wang L; Chen X; Lin MH; Xue J; Lin T; Fan J; Jin L; Ma CM Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111709. PubMed ID: 24320417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]