572 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9071471)
1. Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry.
Cheng XG; Lowet G; Boonen S; Nicholson PH; Brys P; Nijs J; Dequeker J
Bone; 1997 Mar; 20(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 9071471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone.
Bousson V; Le Bras A; Roqueplan F; Kang Y; Mitton D; Kolta S; Bergot C; Skalli W; Vicaut E; Kalender W; Engelke K; Laredo JD
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 16547689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of anteversion on femoral bone mineral density and geometry measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cadaver study.
Cheng XG; Nicholson PH; Boonen S; Brys P; Lowet G; Nijs J; Dequeker J
Bone; 1997 Jul; 21(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 9213017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the strength of the proximal femur in vitro: relationship with ultrasonic measurements of the calcaneus.
Nicholson PH; Lowet G; Cheng XG; Boonen S; van der Perre G; Dequeker J
Bone; 1997 Mar; 20(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 9071472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of vertebral strength in vitro by spinal bone densitometry and calcaneal ultrasound.
Cheng XG; Nicholson PH; Boonen S; Lowet G; Brys P; Aerssens J; Van der Perre G; Dequeker J
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Oct; 12(10):1721-8. PubMed ID: 9333134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. QCT of the proximal femur--which parameters should be measured to discriminate hip fracture?
Museyko O; Bousson V; Adams J; Laredo J-; Engelke K
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):1137-1147. PubMed ID: 26415934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture.
Pulkkinen P; Partanen J; Jalovaara P; Jämsä T
Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):274-80. PubMed ID: 14760516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of anthropometric parameters and bone size on bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual X-ray absorptiometry at the hip.
Guglielmi G; van Kuijk C; Li J; Meta MD; Scillitani A; Lang TF
Acta Radiol; 2006 Jul; 47(6):574-80. PubMed ID: 16875335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proximal femur geometry to detect and distinguish femoral neck fractures from trochanteric fractures in postmenopausal women.
Gnudi S; Ripamonti C; Lisi L; Fini M; Giardino R; Giavaresi G
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Jan; 13(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 11878458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of femoral morphology and bone mineral density between femoral neck fractures and trochanteric fractures.
Maeda Y; Sugano N; Saito M; Yonenobu K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Mar; 469(3):884-9. PubMed ID: 20725817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of Hip Failure Load: In Vitro Study of 80 Femurs Using Three Imaging Methods and Finite Element Models-The European Fracture Study (EFFECT).
Pottecher P; Engelke K; Duchemin L; Museyko O; Moser T; Mitton D; Vicaut E; Adams J; Skalli W; Laredo JD; Bousson V
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 27077380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental hip fracture load can be predicted from plain radiography by combined analysis of trabecular bone structure and bone geometry.
Pulkkinen P; Jämsä T; Lochmüller EM; Kuhn V; Nieminen MT; Eckstein F
Osteoporos Int; 2008 Apr; 19(4):547-58. PubMed ID: 17891327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of DXA and CT based methods for estimating the strength of the femoral neck in post-menopausal women.
Danielson ME; Beck TJ; Karlamangla AS; Greendale GA; Atkinson EJ; Lian Y; Khaled AS; Keaveny TM; Kopperdahl D; Ruppert K; Greenspan S; Vuga M; Cauley JA
Osteoporos Int; 2013 Apr; 24(4):1379-88. PubMed ID: 22810918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength.
Lang TF; Keyak JH; Heitz MW; Augat P; Lu Y; Mathur A; Genant HK
Bone; 1997 Jul; 21(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 9213015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved performance of hip DXA using a novel region of interest in the upper part of the femoral neck: in vitro study using bone strength as a standard of reference.
Boehm HF; Eckstein F; Wunderer C; Kuhn V; Lochmueller EM; Schreiber K; Mueller D; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
J Clin Densitom; 2005; 8(4):488-94. PubMed ID: 16311437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo discrimination of hip fracture with quantitative computed tomography: results from the prospective European Femur Fracture Study (EFFECT).
Bousson VD; Adams J; Engelke K; Aout M; Cohen-Solal M; Bergot C; Haguenauer D; Goldberg D; Champion K; Aksouh R; Vicaut E; Laredo JD
J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Apr; 26(4):881-93. PubMed ID: 20939025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The spatial differences in bone mineral density and hip structure between low-energy femoral neck and trochanteric fractures in elderly Chinese using quantitative computed tomography.
Su YB; Wang L; Wu XB; Yi C; Yang MH; Yan D; Cheng KB; Cheng XG
Bone; 2019 Jul; 124():62-68. PubMed ID: 31004806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness.
Prevrhal S; Fuerst T; Fan B; Njeh C; Hans D; Uffmann M; Srivastav S; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11305080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proximal femur specimens: automated 3D trabecular bone mineral density analysis at multidetector CT--correlation with biomechanical strength measurement.
Huber MB; Carballido-Gamio J; Bauer JS; Baum T; Eckstein F; Lochmüller EM; Majumdar S; Link TM
Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):472-81. PubMed ID: 18430879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of the fracture load of whole proximal femur specimens by topological analysis of the mineral distribution in DXA-scan images.
Boehm HF; Horng A; Notohamiprodjo M; Eckstein F; Burklein D; Panteleon A; Lutz J; Reiser M
Bone; 2008 Nov; 43(5):826-31. PubMed ID: 18723137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
