105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9072002)
1. Nuclear morphometry as a predictor of disease outcome in gastric cancer.
Setälä L; Lipponen P; Kosma VM; Marin S; Eskelinen M; Syrjänen K; Alhava E
J Pathol; 1997 Jan; 181(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 9072002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nuclear profiles of cancer cells reveal the metastatic potential of gastric cancer.
Ikeguchi M; Cai J; Oka S; Gomyou Y; Tsujitani S; Maeta M; Kaibara N
J Pathol; 2000 Sep; 192(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10951395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The significance of nuclear morphometric variables as prognostic predictors in breast cancer.
Aaltomaa S; Lipponen P; Eskelinen M; Kosma VM; Marin S; Alhava E; Syrjänen K
Anticancer Res; 1991; 11(4):1663-9. PubMed ID: 1746922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of classic and quantitative prognostic factors in colorectal cancer.
Ropponen K; Eskelinen M; Kosma VM; Lipponen P; Paakkinen P; Alhava E
Anticancer Res; 1996; 16(6B):3875-82. PubMed ID: 9042274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast cancer in young women: clinical, histological and morphometric prognostic factors.
Eskelinen M; Lipponen P; Aaltomaa S; Kosma VM; Syrjänen K; Alhava E
Anticancer Res; 1992; 12(4):1237-42. PubMed ID: 1503415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Morphometry of gastric carcinoma: its association with patient survival, tumour stage, and DNA ploidy.
Hamilton PW; Wyatt JI; Quirke P; Watt PC; Arthur K; Ward DC; Johnston D
J Pathol; 1992 Oct; 168(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 1460537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic impact of morphometric nuclear grade of endometrial carcinoma.
Salvesen HB; Iversen OE; Akslen LA
Cancer; 1998 Sep; 83(5):956-64. PubMed ID: 9731900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nuclear morphometry in prognostication of breast cancer in Saudi Arabian patients: comparison with European and African breast cancer.
Buhmeida A; Al-Maghrabi J; Merdad A; Al-Thubaity F; Chaudhary A; Gari M; Abuzenadah A; Collan Y; Syrjänen K; Al-Qahtani M
Anticancer Res; 2010 Jun; 30(6):2185-91. PubMed ID: 20651368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of nuclear morphometry of breast cancer in histological sections with clinicopathological features and prognosis.
Abdalla F; Boder J; Markus R; Hashmi H; Buhmeida A; Collan Y
Anticancer Res; 2009 May; 29(5):1771-6. PubMed ID: 19443402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is tumor size a prognostic indicator for gastric carcinoma?
Yokota T; Ishiyama S; Saito T; Teshima S; Yamada Y; Iwamoto K; Takahashi M; Murata K; Yamauchi H
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(6B):3673-7. PubMed ID: 12552975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nuclear size as prognostic determinant in stage II and stage III colorectal adenocarcinoma.
Buhmeida A; Algars A; Ristamäki R; Collan Y; Syrjänen K; Pyrhönen S
Anticancer Res; 2006; 26(1B):455-62. PubMed ID: 16739305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival predictors in patients with node-negative gastric carcinoma.
Lee CC; Wu CW; Lo SS; Chen JH; Li AF; Hsieh MC; Shen KH; Lui WY
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jul; 22(7):1014-8. PubMed ID: 17608847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of colorectal cancer prognosis through nuclear morphometry.
Eynard HG; Soria EA; Cuestas E; Rovasio RA; Eynard AR
J Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 154(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 18708194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nuclear morphometry in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma; relation to histological grade, clinical stage, and survival.
Lipponen P; Eskelinen M; Collan Y
Ital J Gastroenterol; 1990 Jun; 22(3):124-8. PubMed ID: 1966706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adenocarcinoma in the middle third of the stomach--an evaluation for the prognostic significance of clinicopathological features.
Sheen-Chen SM; Chou CW; Chen MC; Chen FC; Chen YS; Chen JJ
Hepatogastroenterology; 1997; 44(17):1488-94. PubMed ID: 9356878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer with submucosal invasion: analysis of a single institutional experience.
An JY; Baik YH; Choi MG; Noh JH; Sohn TS; Kim S
Ann Surg; 2007 Nov; 246(5):749-53. PubMed ID: 17968165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Paradoxical expression of maspin in gastric carcinomas: correlation with carcinogenesis and progression.
Yu M; Zheng H; Tsuneyama K; Takahashi H; Nomoto K; Xu H; Takano Y
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1248-55. PubMed ID: 17490717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Relationship between new TNM classification and the prognosis and biological behavior of gastric cancer].
Wang Z; Xu H; Wang S; Chen J
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jul; 38(7):493-5. PubMed ID: 11832089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nuclear grading of primary pulmonary adenocarcinomas: correlation between nuclear size and prognosis.
Nakazato Y; Minami Y; Kobayashi H; Satomi K; Anami Y; Tsuta K; Tanaka R; Okada M; Goya T; Noguchi M
Cancer; 2010 Apr; 116(8):2011-9. PubMed ID: 20151423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffuse type advanced gastric cancer showing dismal prognosis is characterized by deeper invasion and emerging peritoneal cancer cell: the latest comparative study to intestinal advanced gastric cancer.
Yamashita K; Sakuramoto S; Katada N; Futawatari N; Moriya H; Hirai K; Kikuchi S; Watanabe M
Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(89):276-81. PubMed ID: 19453074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
