These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9072893)

  • 1. [Modern diagnostic methods in multiple sclerosis].
    Bisaga GN; Golovkin VI; Lytaev SA; Mikhaĭlenko AA
    Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 1996; 96(6):40-3. PubMed ID: 9072893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple sclerosis. Magnetic resonance imaging, evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid analysis.
    David P; Ristori GP; Elia M; Bartoli A; Ciervo A; Massaro AR; Carbone G
    Acta Neurol (Napoli); 1990 Jun; 12(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 2403026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subclinical visual involvement in multiple sclerosis: a study by MRI, VEPs, frequency-doubling perimetry, standard perimetry, and contrast sensitivity.
    Sisto D; Trojano M; Vetrugno M; Trabucco T; Iliceto G; Sborgia C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 46(4):1264-8. PubMed ID: 15790888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative study of visual evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis].
    Miletto G; Merlihot JM; Nezri M; Stanoyevitch JF; Pernet-Rambaud C; Houis B
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1988; 11(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 3385127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Visual evoked potentials and click-evoked brainstem potentials in early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: statistics (author's transl)].
    Lehmann D; Soukos I
    Nervenarzt; 1982 Jun; 53(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 7110454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are somatosensory evoked potentials of the tibial nerve the most sensitive test in diagnosing multiple sclerosis?
    Djuric S; Djuric V; Zivkovic M; Milosevic V; Jolic M; Stamenovic J; Djordjevic G; Calixto M
    Neurol India; 2010; 58(4):537-41. PubMed ID: 20739788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative study of magnetic resonance and evoked potentials in patients with clinically defined multiple sclerosis].
    Iriarte J; de Castro P; Gudín M; Martínez-Lage JM
    Neurologia; 1991 Nov; 6(9):322-7. PubMed ID: 1809338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Visual, early auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis (917 cases)].
    Fischer C; Mauguière F; Ibañez V; Courjon J
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 1986; 142(5):517-23. PubMed ID: 3787054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Laboratory diagnosis of multiple sclerosis].
    Sand T; Stovner LJ; Rinck PA; Nilsen G; Romslo I
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Aug; 111(18):2267-70. PubMed ID: 1896982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The conduction of nerve impulses through MRIT2 hyperintense areas of patients with multiple sclerosis].
    Iriarte J; de Castro P; Zubieta JL; Artieda J
    Neurologia; 1993; 8(6):194-6. PubMed ID: 8352976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-clinical tests for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
    Rossini PM; Caramia M; Lavaroni F; Spadaro M; Floris R; Tanfani G; Zarola F; Traversa R; Marciani MG; Bernardi G
    Riv Neurol; 1987; 57(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 3629127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The diagnostic value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography, multimodal evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid examination in multiple sclerosis].
    Staffen W; Trinka E; Ladurner G
    Nervenarzt; 1993 Apr; 64(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 8506010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Visual and acoustic evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis].
    Kofler B
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1985 Jan; 135(1-2):35-8. PubMed ID: 3976237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
    Hamilton-Bruce MA; Black AB; Chappell DJ; Pannall PR
    Clin Exp Neurol; 1989; 26():89-97. PubMed ID: 2642142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Diagnostic importance of middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) in multiple sclerosis].
    Delalande I; Thomas D; Forzy G; Hautecoeur P; Gallois P
    Neurophysiol Clin; 1997 Sep; 27(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 9411208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined visual and motor evoked potentials predict multiple sclerosis disability after 20 years.
    Schlaeger R; Schindler C; Grize L; Dellas S; Radue EW; Kappos L; Fuhr P
    Mult Scler; 2014 Sep; 20(10):1348-54. PubMed ID: 24574192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Value of multimodal evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis].
    Reisecker F; Hubatschek W; Steinhäusl H
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1986 Jun; 98(12):379-85. PubMed ID: 3739354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High click stimulus repetition rate in the auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients with normal MRI. Does it improve diagnosis?
    Santos MA; Munhoz MS; Peixoto MA; Silva CS
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 15605430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Magnetic stimulation motor evoked potential in multiple sclerosis. Comparison with visual evoked potentials, brain stem auditory evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials].
    Cui L
    Zhonghua Shen Jing Jing Shen Ke Za Zhi; 1992 Jun; 25(3):130-2, 189. PubMed ID: 1395937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical correlations and evoked potentials in 29 cases of definitive multiple sclerosis].
    Ferrer S; Jiménez P; Mellado L; Thieck E
    Rev Med Chil; 1993 Oct; 121(10):1154-60. PubMed ID: 8191120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.