BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9073750)

  • 1. Laparoscopic Treatment of Distal Tubal Occlusion-Reocclusion and Pregnancy Rate.
    Sasse V; Karageorgieva E; Keckstein J
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1994 Aug; 1(4, Part 2):S32. PubMed ID: 9073750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tubal patency and conception rates with three methods of laparoscopic terminal neosalpingostomy.
    Oh ST
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1996 Aug; 3(4):519-23. PubMed ID: 9050682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Distal tubal surgery using laparoscopy].
    Eyraud B; Erny R; Vergnet F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993; 22(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8463574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic salpingostomy: fertility results according to the tubal mucosal appearance.
    Dubuisson JB; Chapron C; Morice P; Aubriot FX; Foulot H; Bouquet de Jolinière J
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Feb; 9(2):334-9. PubMed ID: 8027292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reversal of Kroener fimbriectomy sterilization.
    Novy MJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 May; 137(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 7377240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pregnancy outcome in neosalpingostomy by the cuff vs Bruhat technique using the carbon dioxide laser.
    Chong AP
    J Gynecol Surg; 1991; 7(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 10149784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new tubal classification system for fertility prognosis after laparoscopic salpingostomy for tubal pregnancy.
    Ding Y; Huang W; Jiang H; Zhu J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():136-41. PubMed ID: 27285304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomised trial of systemic methotrexate versus laparoscopic salpingostomy in tubal pregnancy.
    Hajenius PJ; Engelsbel S; Mol BW; Van der Veen F; Ankum WM; Bossuyt PM; Hemrika DJ; Lammes FB
    Lancet; 1997 Sep; 350(9080):774-9. PubMed ID: 9297998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic salpingotomy for tubal pregnancy: comparison of linear salpingotomy with and without suturing.
    Fujishita A; Masuzaki H; Khan KN; Kitajima M; Hiraki K; Ishimaru T
    Hum Reprod; 2004 May; 19(5):1195-200. PubMed ID: 15044407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Microsurgical therapy in tubal sterility].
    Fritzsche H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(21):1325-9. PubMed ID: 2278215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Techniques for pelvic surgery in subfertility.
    Watson A; Vandekerckhove P; Lilford R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000221. PubMed ID: 10796702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is microsurgery necessary for salpingostomy? The evaluation of results.
    Winston RM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Aug; 21(3):143-52. PubMed ID: 7036983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fallopian tube recanalization: lessons learnt and future challenges.
    Allahbadia GN; Merchant R
    Womens Health (Lond); 2010 Jul; 6(4):531-48, quiz 548-9. PubMed ID: 20597618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of tubal patency with transvaginal salpingosonography after treatment for tubal pregnancy.
    Spalding H; Tekay A; Martikainen H; Jouppila P
    Hum Reprod; 1997 Feb; 12(2):306-9. PubMed ID: 9070717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopy or laparotomy for distal tubal surgery? A meta-analysis.
    Ahmad G; Watson AJ; Metwally M
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2007 Mar; 10(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 17454208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Microsurgery of distal tubal lesions. Analysis of 270 operated cases].
    Donnez J; Casanas-Roux F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 3734348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The value of laparoscopic and laser-assisted techniques in reconstruction of distal fallopian tube pathology].
    Wallwiener D; Maleika A; Rimbach S; Homann G; Rabe T; Gauwerky J; Bastert G
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(2):66-72. PubMed ID: 8851092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors influencing the success of salpingostomy techniques for distal fimbrial obstruction.
    Rock JA; Katayama KP; Martin EJ; Woodruff JD; Jones HW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Nov; 52(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 724178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy.
    Hajenius PJ; Mol BW; Bossuyt PM; Ankum WM; Van Der Veen F
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000324. PubMed ID: 10796710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure.
    Winston RM; Margara RA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 1832011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.