These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9074851)

  • 1. Meta-analysis and endocrinology.
    Petitti DB
    Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am; 1997 Mar; 26(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 9074851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can meta-analyses be trusted?
    Thompson SG; Pocock SJ
    Lancet; 1991 Nov; 338(8775):1127-30. PubMed ID: 1682553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic reviews: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
    Yuan Y; Hunt RH
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 May; 104(5):1086-92. PubMed ID: 19417748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Invited review: Use of meta-analysis in animal health and reproduction: methods and applications.
    Lean IJ; Rabiee AR; Duffield TF; Dohoo IR
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Aug; 92(8):3545-65. PubMed ID: 19620636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early studies reported extreme findings with large variability: a meta-epidemiologic study in the field of endocrinology.
    Wang Z; Alahdab F; Almasri J; Haydour Q; Mohammed K; Abu Dabrh AM; Prokop LJ; Alfarkh W; Lakis S; Montori VM; Murad MH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 72():27-32. PubMed ID: 26560990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis: Methods, strengths, weaknesses, and political uses.
    Noble JH
    J Lab Clin Med; 2006 Jan; 147(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 16443000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can statistic adjustment of OR minimize the potential confounding bias for meta-analysis of case-control study? A secondary data analysis.
    Liu T; Nie X; Wu Z; Zhang Y; Feng G; Cai S; Lv Y; Peng X
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):179. PubMed ID: 29284414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Problems caused by heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a case study of acupuncture trials.
    Prady SL; Burch J; Crouch S; MacPherson H
    Acupunct Med; 2014 Feb; 32(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 24140758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.
    Sterne JA; Gavaghan D; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):1119-29. PubMed ID: 11106885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in endocrinology: an audit of methods, reporting, and performance.
    Spencer-Bonilla G; Singh Ospina N; Rodriguez-Gutierrez R; Brito JP; Iñiguez-Ariza N; Tamhane S; Erwin PJ; Murad MH; Montori VM
    Endocrine; 2017 Jul; 57(1):18-34. PubMed ID: 28585154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when they are useful and when to be careful.
    Noordzij M; Hooft L; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Kidney Int; 2009 Dec; 76(11):1130-6. PubMed ID: 19727062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primer on systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tonelli M; Hackam D; Garg AX
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 473():217-33. PubMed ID: 19160741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on the predictive values of results from meta-analyses.
    Melsen WG; Bootsma MC; Rovers MM; Bonten MJ
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 24320992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new measure of between-studies heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Crippa A; Khudyakov P; Wang M; Orsini N; Spiegelman D
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(21):3661-75. PubMed ID: 27161124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis.
    Tang JL; Liu JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 May; 53(5):477-84. PubMed ID: 10812319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analyses.
    von Hippel PT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():35. PubMed ID: 25880989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.