These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9075178)
1. Effects of perceived listeners on speakers' vocal intensity. Healey EC; Jones R; Berky R J Voice; 1997 Mar; 11(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 9075178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners. Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vocal Age Disguise: The Role of Fundamental Frequency and Speech Rate and Its Perceived Effects. Skoog Waller S; Eriksson M Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1814. PubMed ID: 27917144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of vocal disguise on estimations of speakers' ages. Lass NJ; Justice LA; George BD; Baldwin LM; Scherbick KA; Wright DL Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Jun; 54(3 Pt 2):1311-5. PubMed ID: 7110873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test. Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of vocal loudness variation on spectrum balance as reflected by the alpha measure of long-term-average spectra of speech. Sundberg J; Nordenberg M J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):453-7. PubMed ID: 16875241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of production and presentation level on the auditory distance perception of speech. Brungart DS; Scott KR J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):425-40. PubMed ID: 11508968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of vocal disguise on judgments of speakers' sex and race. Lass NJ; Trapp DS; Baldwin MK; Scherbick KA; Wright DL Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Jun; 54(3 Pt 2):1235-40. PubMed ID: 7110866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship of vocal loudness manipulation to prosodic F0 and durational variables in healthy adults. Watson PJ; Hughes D J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Jun; 49(3):636-44. PubMed ID: 16787901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perception of vocal tremor during sustained phonation compared with sentence context. Lederle A; Barkmeier-Kraemer J; Finnegan E J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):668.e1-9. PubMed ID: 22521323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of distance on vocal intensity. Michael DD; Siegel GM; Pick HL J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Oct; 38(5):1176-83. PubMed ID: 8558886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of vocal disguise on estimations of speakers' heights and weights. Lass NJ; Scherbick KA; Davies SL; Czarnecki TD Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Apr; 54(2):643-9. PubMed ID: 7079085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What makes a voice masculine: physiological and acoustical correlates of women's ratings of men's vocal masculinity. Cartei V; Bond R; Reby D Horm Behav; 2014 Sep; 66(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 25169905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bridging gaps in common ground: Speakers design their gestures for their listeners. Hilliard C; Cook SW J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 26120773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Noise on Vocal Loudness and Pitch in Natural Environments: An Accelerometer (Ambulatory Phonation Monitor) Study. Yiu EM; Yip PP J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 26106071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between perception of vocal effort and relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset. Stepp CE; Sawin DE; Eadie TL J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1887-96. PubMed ID: 22615477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Listener-speaker perceived distance predicts the degree of motor contribution to speech perception. Bartoli E; D'Ausilio A; Berry J; Badino L; Bever T; Fadiga L Cereb Cortex; 2015 Feb; 25(2):281-8. PubMed ID: 24046079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between speech rate perceived and produced by the listener. Schwab S Phonetica; 2011; 68(4):243-55. PubMed ID: 22286166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rate and loudness manipulations in dysarthria: acoustic and perceptual findings. Tjaden K; Wilding GE J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):766-83. PubMed ID: 15324285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Whisper and Phonation: Aerodynamic Comparisons Across Adduction and Loudness. Konnai R; Scherer RC; Peplinski A; Ryan K J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):773.e11-773.e20. PubMed ID: 28366247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]