These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9075178)

  • 21. Voice Quality in Native and Foreign Languages Investigated by Inverse Filtering and Perceptual Analyses.
    Järvinen K; Laukkanen AM; Geneid A
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):261.e25-261.e31. PubMed ID: 27495969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The contribution of phonation type to the perception of vocal emotions in German: an articulatory synthesis study.
    Birkholz P; Martin L; Willmes K; Kröger BJ; Neuschaefer-Rube C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1503-12. PubMed ID: 25786961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Loud speech in realistic environmental noise: phonetogram data, perceptual voice quality, subjective ratings, and gender differences in healthy speakers.
    Södersten M; Ternström S; Bohman M
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):29-46. PubMed ID: 15766848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of Vocal Fry and Speaker Gender on Listener Perceptions of Speaker Personal Attributes.
    Taylor B; Wheeler-Hegland K; Logan KJ
    J Voice; 2022 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 36400634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Listener impressions of speakers with Parkinson's disease.
    Jaywant A; Pell MD
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Jan; 16(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 19758475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of listeners' comprehension on judgments of speakers' height and weight.
    Lass NJ; Riley AL; Giachetti JA; Cline AL; Dodson CK; Bellotte SL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Oct; 53(2):647-53. PubMed ID: 7312549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of speaker gender on listener judgments of tracheoesophageal speech.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC; Hansen K; Beaudin PG
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 17055223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Judgments of Intelligence and Likability of Young Adult Female Speakers of American English: The Influence of Vocal Fry and the Surrounding Acoustic-Prosodic Context.
    Parker MA; Borrie SA
    J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):538-545. PubMed ID: 28958872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Phonation offset in tracheoesophageal speech.
    Searl J; Ousley T
    J Commun Disord; 2004; 37(4):371-87. PubMed ID: 15159194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A multidimensional scaling study of voice quality in females.
    Gelfer MP
    Phonetica; 1993; 50(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 8516383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Impact of Dysphonic Voices on Healthy Listeners: Listener Reaction Times, Speech Intelligibility, and Listener Comprehension.
    Evitts PM; Starmer H; Teets K; Montgomery C; Calhoun L; Schulze A; MacKenzie J; Adams L
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Nov; 25(4):561-575. PubMed ID: 27784031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interspeaker variability in emphatic accent production in French.
    Dahan D; Bernard JM
    Lang Speech; 1996; 39 ( Pt 4)():341-74. PubMed ID: 9156500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neural architecture underlying person perception from in-group and out-group voices.
    Jiang X; Sanford R; Pell MD
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():582-597. PubMed ID: 30031933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Listening preferences for voice types as a function of age.
    Hollien H; Gelfer MP; Carlson T
    J Commun Disord; 1991 Apr; 24(2):157-71. PubMed ID: 2066473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relationship between masking levels and phonatory stability in normal-speaking women.
    Ferrand CT
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 16157468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis of vocal abuse: fluctuations in phonation time and intensity in 4 groups of speakers.
    Masuda T; Ikeda Y; Manako H; Komiyama S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1993 Jul; 113(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 8379311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of clear speech on auditory-perceptual judgments of electrolaryngeal speech.
    Cox SR; Doyle PC
    J Commun Disord; 2018; 75():25-36. PubMed ID: 30005317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of experience on judgments of adductor spasmodic dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Nicolici C; Baylor C; Almand K; Waugh P; Maronian N
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2007 Sep; 116(9):695-701. PubMed ID: 17926593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Individual Monitoring of Vocal Effort With Relative Fundamental Frequency: Relationships With Aerodynamics and Listener Perception.
    Lien YA; Michener CM; Eadie TL; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 58(3):566-75. PubMed ID: 25675090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.