95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9075541)
1. Outcomes of induced labour.
Robson S; Pridmore B; Dodd J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Feb; 37(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 9075541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrospective study of maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction compared to spontaneous start of labour in women with one previous birth in uncomplicated pregnancies ≥ 41+3.
Lindegren L; Stuart A; Carlsson Fagerberg M; Källén K
J Perinat Med; 2020 Aug; 49(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 32829318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do you pay to go private?: a single centre comparison of induction of labour and caesarean section rates in private versus public patients.
Craven S; Byrne F; Mahony R; Walsh JM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Dec; 20(1):746. PubMed ID: 33261564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using inter-institutional practice variation to understand the risks and benefits of routine labour induction at 41(+0) weeks.
Hutcheon JA; Harper S; Strumpf EC; Lee L; Marquette G
BJOG; 2015 Jun; 122(7):973-81. PubMed ID: 25041161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Induction of labour: indications and obstetric outcomes in a tertiary referral hospital.
Buist R
N Z Med J; 1999 Jul; 112(1091):251-3. PubMed ID: 10448982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of induction of labour in nulliparous women at 38 to 39 weeks pregnancy by clinical indication: An observational study.
de Vries BS; Barratt A; McGeechan K; Tooher J; Wong E; Phipps H; Gordon A; Hyett JA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Aug; 59(4):484-492. PubMed ID: 30588611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Obstetric outcomes associated with induction of labour after caesarean section.
Gobillot S; Ghenassia A; Coston AL; Gillois P; Equy V; Michy T; Hoffmann P
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Dec; 47(10):539-543. PubMed ID: 30253940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study.
Nippita TA; Lee YY; Patterson JA; Ford JB; Morris JM; Nicholl MC; Roberts CL
BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):702-11. PubMed ID: 25605625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trial of labour in twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.
de Castro H; Haas J; Schiff E; Sivan E; Yinon Y; Barzilay E
BJOG; 2016 May; 123(6):940-5. PubMed ID: 26228895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Induction of labour vs. spontaneous vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy after 36 weeks of gestation.
Tavares MV; Domingues AP; Nunes F; Tavares M; Fonseca E; Moura P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 27925470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Obstetric outcomes in oxytocin-related and spontaneous deliveries--analysis of 2198 cases].
Raba G; Baran P
Ginekol Pol; 2009 Jul; 80(7):508-11. PubMed ID: 19697814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials.
Bernardes TP; Broekhuijsen K; Koopmans CM; Boers KE; van Wyk L; Tajik P; van Pampus MG; Scherjon SA; Mol BW; Franssen MT; van den Berg PP; Groen H
BJOG; 2016 Aug; 123(9):1501-8. PubMed ID: 27173131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour compared to expectant management at term from an Australian perinatal centre.
Zhao Y; Flatley C; Kumar S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Feb; 57(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 28251626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
Glantz JC
J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A contemporary approach to the obstetric management of women with heart disease.
Robertson JE; Silversides CK; Ling Mah M; Kulikowski J; Maxwell C; Wald RM; Colman JM; Siu SC; Sermer M
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2012 Sep; 34(9):812-819. PubMed ID: 22971448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trends in obstetric interventions in the Dutch obstetrical care system in the period 1993-2002.
Kwee A; Elferink-Stinkens PM; Reuwer PJ; Bruinse HW
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 May; 132(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 16884843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of fetal sex on the outcome of labour induction.
Agarwal U; Anastasakis E; Kadir RA
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Nov; 29(8):711-3. PubMed ID: 19821663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Caesarean section rates in subgroups of women and perinatal outcomes.
Zhang J; Geerts C; Hukkelhoven C; Offerhaus P; Zwart J; de Jonge A
BJOG; 2016 Apr; 123(5):754-61. PubMed ID: 26216434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neonatal and Maternal Short-Term Outcome Parameters in Instrument-Assisted Vaginal Delivery Compared to Second Stage Cesarean Section in Labour: A Retrospective 11-Year Analysis.
Polkowski M; Kuehnle E; Schippert C; Kundu S; Hillemanns P; Staboulidou I
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 28222428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Caesarean section following induction of labour in uncomplicated first births- a population-based cross-sectional analysis of 42,950 births.
Davey MA; King J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Apr; 16():92. PubMed ID: 27121614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
