These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9076269)

  • 1. A selection test for Australian graduate-entry medical schools.
    Aldous CJ; Leeder SR; Price J; Sefton AE; Teubner JK
    Med J Aust; 1997 Mar; 166(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9076269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates' performance in 2014.
    Mercer A; Crotty B; Alldridge L; Le L; Vele V
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():31. PubMed ID: 25889535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting academic outcomes in an Australian graduate entry medical programme.
    Puddey IB; Mercer A
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Feb; 14():31. PubMed ID: 24528509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Entry tests for graduate medical programs: is it time to re-think?
    Groves MA; Gordon J; Ryan G
    Med J Aust; 2007 Feb; 186(3):120-3. PubMed ID: 17309399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of accelerated, graduate-entry medicine courses: a comparison of profile, success, and specialty destination between graduate entrants to accelerated or standard medicine courses in UK.
    Garrud P; McManus IC
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):250. PubMed ID: 30400933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relative predictive value of undergraduate versus graduate selection tools in two Australian medical schools.
    Mercer A; Hay M; Hodgson WC; Canny BJ; Puddey IB
    Med Teach; 2018 Nov; 40(11):1183-1190. PubMed ID: 29355058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing for medical school selection: What are prospective doctors' experiences and perceptions of the GAMSAT and what are the consequences of testing?
    Kumar K; Roberts C; Bartle E; Eley DS
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 23(3):533-546. PubMed ID: 29388087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Establishing the criterion validity of the Graduate Medical School Admissions Test (GAMSAT).
    Coates H
    Med Educ; 2008 Oct; 42(10):999-1006. PubMed ID: 18823519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are efforts to attract graduate applicants to UK medical schools effective in increasing the participation of under-represented socioeconomic groups? A national cohort study.
    Kumwenda B; Cleland J; Greatrix R; MacKenzie RK; Prescott G
    BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e018946. PubMed ID: 29444782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prior degree and academic performance in medical school: evidence for prioritising health students and moving away from a bio-medical science-focused entry stream.
    Aston-Mourney K; McLeod J; Rivera LR; McNeill BA; Baldi DL
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 Oct; 22(1):700. PubMed ID: 36195862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. James Cook University's rurally orientated medical school selection process: quality graduates and positive workforce outcomes.
    Ray RA; Woolley T; Sen Gupta T
    Rural Remote Health; 2015; 15(4):3424. PubMed ID: 26442581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors affecting the utility of the multiple mini-interview in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school.
    Roberts C; Walton M; Rothnie I; Crossley J; Lyon P; Kumar K; Tiller D
    Med Educ; 2008 Apr; 42(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 18338992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative progress and academic performance of graduate vs undergraduate entrants to an Australian medical school.
    Puddey IB; Mercer A; Carr SE
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):159. PubMed ID: 31113431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting success in medical school: a longitudinal study of common Australian student selection tools.
    Sladek RM; Bond MJ; Frost LK; Prior KN
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jul; 16():187. PubMed ID: 27450570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance at medical school selection correlates with success in Part A of the intercollegiate Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examination.
    Ellis R; Brennan P; Scrimgeour DS; Lee AJ; Cleland J
    Postgrad Med J; 2022 Jul; 98(1161):e19. PubMed ID: 33692157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Graduate entry to medical school? Testing some assumptions.
    Rolfe IE; Ringland C; Pearson SA
    Med Educ; 2004 Jul; 38(7):778-86. PubMed ID: 15200402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Removing the interview for medical school selection is associated with gender bias among enrolled students.
    Wilkinson D; Casey MG; Eley DS
    Med J Aust; 2014 Feb; 200(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 24484112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does practice make perfect? The effect of coaching and retesting on selection tests used for admission to an Australian medical school.
    Griffin B; Harding DW; Wilson IG; Yeomans ND
    Med J Aust; 2008 Sep; 189(5):270-3. PubMed ID: 18759725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting success in graduate entry medical students undertaking a graduate entry medical program.
    Haldane T; Shehmar M; Macdougall CF; Price-Forbes A; Fraser I; Petersen S; Peile E
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(8):659-64. PubMed ID: 22830324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examination performance of graduate entry medical students compared with mainstream students.
    Calvert MJ; Ross NM; Freemantle N; Xu Y; Zvauya R; Parle JV
    J R Soc Med; 2009 Oct; 102(10):425-30. PubMed ID: 19797600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.