These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9077091)

  • 21. [Study of X-ray filter and peak kilovoltage in Fuji Computed Radiography in regard to the detection of simulated pulmonary nodules].
    Kiyono K; Sone S; Sakai F; Kawai T; Karakida O; Oguchi K; Kasuga T; Hirano H; Miyasaka T; Matsumoto T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Oct; 54(12):1126-35. PubMed ID: 9340603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A ROC study of AMBER and conventional chest imaging in the detection of simulated interstitial lung disease.
    van Schelven IH; Winter LH; Chakraborty DP; Schultze Kool LJ
    Eur J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 21(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 8654463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose: comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon.
    Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser JK; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Feuerbach S
    Invest Radiol; 1998 Feb; 33(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 9493725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Value of lung filter, asymmetric film-screen technique and digital storage screen radiography in diagnosis of coin lesion].
    Müller RD; Hirche H; Wähling S; Gocke C; Gocke P; Buddenbrock B; Turowski B; John V; Blendl C; Langer R
    Pneumologie; 1997 Mar; 51(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 9173420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Mosser H; Pärtan G; Urban M; Krampla W; Ottes F; Hruby W
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Mar; 30(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computed radiography dual energy subtraction: performance evaluation when detecting low-contrast lung nodules in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Davis DL; McNitt-Gray M; Goldin J; Hart E; Batra P; Johnson TD
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Feb; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 10036665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kheddache S; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE; Denbratt L; Gottfridsson B; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR
    Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):727-34. PubMed ID: 10580946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules.
    Kelcz F; Zink FE; Peppler WW; Kruger DG; Ergun DL; Mistretta CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Performance study of teleradiology network systems with CRT monitors: ROC analysis of an observation study of simulated lung nodules].
    Takizawa M; Sone S; Oguchi K; Maruyama Y; Watanabe T; Gomi K; Wako T; Okazaki Y; Momose M; Imai S; Maruyama A; Sakai F
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Dec; 56(14):1061-5. PubMed ID: 9014469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Detection of monitoring materials on bedside chest radiographs with the most recent generation of storage phosphor plates: dose increase does not improve detection performance.
    Eisenhuber E; Stadler A; Prokop M; Fuchsjager M; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):216-21. PubMed ID: 12668747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
    Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography.
    Morishita J; MacMahon H; Doi K; Carlin M; Sukenobu Y
    Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1769-75. PubMed ID: 7891639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of CT-proved pulmonary nodules: comparison of selenium-based digital and conventional screen-film chest radiographs.
    Woodard PK; Slone RM; Sagel SS; Fleishman MJ; Gutierrez FR; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
    Radiology; 1998 Dec; 209(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 9844662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
    Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DB; McFaul JA
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3420264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Image quality for five modern chest radiography techniques: a modified FROC study with an anthropomorphic chest phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Lanhede B; Tylén U
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(9):1826-34. PubMed ID: 10602958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.