These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Dentists' molar restoration choices and longevity: a web-based survey. Rosenstiel SF; Land MF; Rashid RG J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 15116038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. Hickel R; Manhart J J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 11317384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults. Forss H; Widström E Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Apr; 62(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 15198387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of an administrative database of indirect restorations over 11 years. Lucarotti PS; Burke FJ J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 18550255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term survival and cost-effectiveness of five dental restorative materials used in various classes of cavity preparations. Smales RJ; Hawthorne WS Int Dent J; 1996 Jun; 46(3):126-30. PubMed ID: 8886864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars. Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical long-term evaluation and failure characteristics of 1,335 all-ceramic restorations. Beier US; Kapferer I; Dumfahrt H Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 22259801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Mjör IA; Moorhead JE; Dahl JE Acta Odontol Scand; 1999 Oct; 57(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 10614902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modern alternatives to amalgam: cementable restorations and inlays. Wirz J; Jaeger K Quintessence Int; 1999 Aug; 30(8):551-6. PubMed ID: 10635268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term cost-effectiveness of single indirect restorations in selected dental practices. Kelly PG; Smales RJ Br Dent J; 2004 May; 196(10):639-43; discussion 627. PubMed ID: 15153977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure. Malament KA; Socransky SS J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 11725279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars. Papathanasiou AG; Curzon ME; Fairpo CG Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 7937261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Mjör IA; Dahl JE; Moorhead JE Acta Odontol Scand; 2000 Jun; 58(3):97-101. PubMed ID: 10933556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]