128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9079163)
21. Correction to "Empirical support for the United States Supreme Court's protection of the psychotherapist-patient privilege".
Marsh JE
Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(2):197-9. PubMed ID: 15835047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Empirical support for the United States Supreme Court's protection of the psychotherapist-patient privilege.
Marsh JE
Ethics Behav; 2003; 13(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 15000103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Psychotherapy as law enforcement.
Herbert PB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 15497636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Wrapped in silence: psychotherapists and confidentiality in the courtroom.
Gutierrez-Lobos K; Wagner E; Schmidl-Mohl B; Scmhid-Siegel B
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2000 Feb; 44(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 11942335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The psychotherapist-patient privilege in Washington: extending the privilege to community mental health clinics.
Hague WW
Wash Law Rev; 1983 Jul; 58(3):565-86. PubMed ID: 11658506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Psychotherapist-patient testimonial privilege: a picture of misguided hope.
Slovenko R
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1974; 23(4):649-73. PubMed ID: 11664361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The duty to protect.
Chaimowitz G; Glancy G;
Can J Psychiatry; 2002 Sep; 47(7):suppl 1-5. PubMed ID: 12355688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [The control commission in the mental health services - Herman Wedel Majors innovation].
Høyer G
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2016 Jul; 136(12-13):1109-12. PubMed ID: 27381793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Court responses to Tarasoff statutes.
Kachigian C; Felthous AR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 15515914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Historical background of psychotherapy as a new scientific field.
Harms E
Dis Nerv Syst; 1970 Feb; 31(2):116-8. PubMed ID: 4908854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The Supreme Court's decision to recognize a psychotherapist privilege in Jaffee v. Redmond, 116 S. Ct. 1923 (1996): the meaning of "experience and the role of "reason" under Federal Rule of Evidence 501.
Amann DM; Imwinkelried EJ
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1997; 65(4):1019-49. PubMed ID: 16086528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Breaking confidentiality survey.
Zadik YZ
Med Law; 1993; 12(3-5):257-62. PubMed ID: 8231691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Alfred Adler: eminent psychiatrist.
Ellis H
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2020 Feb; 81(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 32097064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Jaffee v. Redmond: psychotherapist-patient privilege in the federal courts.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 1996 Oct; 47(10):1033-4, 1052. PubMed ID: 8890329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [On the reform of legislation on mental patients].
Baruk H
Bull Acad Natl Med; 1965 May; 149(18):413-8. PubMed ID: 5320038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The privilege study: an empirical examination of the psychotherapist-patient privilege.
Shuman DW; Weiner MS
North Carol Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 60(5):893-942. PubMed ID: 11658717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Ethical obligations for the psychiatrist: confidentiality, privilege, and privacy in psychiatric treatment.
Sadoff R
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1996 Jun; 29(4):1709-16. PubMed ID: 12474647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The secrets of testimonial privilege.
Shanaberger CJ
JEMS; 1988 May; 13(5):76-8. PubMed ID: 10286877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The liability of psychotherapists for breach of confidentiality.
Grabois EW
J Law Health; 1997-1998; 12(1):39-84. PubMed ID: 10182030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The furor over psychotherapist-patient sexual contact: new solutions to an old problem.
Jorgenson L; Randles R; Strasburger L
William Mary Law Rev; 1991; 32(3):645-732. PubMed ID: 16145800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
