These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9079397)

  • 21. Uterine Receptivity in Merriam's Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys merriami).
    Dudley JS; Murphy CR; Thompson MB; Mcallan BM
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2018 Nov; 301(11):1928-1935. PubMed ID: 30288962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correlated light and electron microscopy observations of the uterine epithelial cell actin cytoskeleton using fluorescently labeled resin-embedded sections.
    Moore CL; Cheng D; Shami GJ; Murphy CR
    Micron; 2016 May; 84():61-6. PubMed ID: 26930006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Change in distribution of cytoskeleton-associated proteins, lasp-1 and palladin, during uterine receptivity in the rat endometrium.
    Nicholson L; Lindsay L; Murphy CR
    Reprod Fertil Dev; 2018 Oct; 30(11):1482-1490. PubMed ID: 29739492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The regulatory function of the uterine epithelium for trophoblast attachment: experimental approaches.
    Denker HW; Thie M
    Ital J Anat Embryol; 2001; 106(2 Suppl 2):291-306. PubMed ID: 11732588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Molecular determinants of uterine receptivity.
    Tu Z; Ran H; Zhang S; Xia G; Wang B; Wang H
    Int J Dev Biol; 2014; 58(2-4):147-54. PubMed ID: 25023680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Deciphering the molecular basis of uterine receptivity.
    Zhang S; Kong S; Lu J; Wang Q; Chen Y; Wang W; Wang B; Wang H
    Mol Reprod Dev; 2013 Jan; 80(1):8-21. PubMed ID: 23070972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Demonstration of uterine receptivity in vitro by co-culture of rat epithelial cells and blastocyst.
    Srinivasan KR; Dwivedi A; Jain SK; Mehrotra PK
    Cell Tissue Res; 2006 Jul; 325(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 16528553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Models for the study of uterine receptivity for blastocyst implantation.
    Sharpe-Timms KL; Glasser SR
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1999; 17(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 10406080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cytoskeletal proteins in uterine epithelial cells only partially return to the pre-receptive state after the period of receptivity.
    Png FY; Murphy CR
    Acta Histochem; 2002; 104(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 12389737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adhesiveness of the apical surface of uterine epithelial cells: the role of junctional complex integrity.
    Thie M; Fuchs P; Butz S; Sieckmann F; Hoschützky H; Kemler R; Denker HW
    Eur J Cell Biol; 1996 Jul; 70(3):221-32. PubMed ID: 8832206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reorganization of the apical cytoskeleton of uterine epithelial cells during early pregnancy in the rat: a study with myosin subfragment 1.
    Luxford KA; Murphy CR
    Biol Cell; 1992; 74(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 1596639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Amphiregulin is an implantation-specific and progesterone-regulated gene in the mouse uterus.
    Das SK; Chakraborty I; Paria BC; Wang XN; Plowman G; Dey SK
    Mol Endocrinol; 1995 Jun; 9(6):691-705. PubMed ID: 8592515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Desmoglein-2 during pregnancy and its role in the evolution of viviparity in a marsupial (Sminthopsis crassicaudata; Dasyuridae).
    Dudley JS; Murphy CR; Thompson MB; McAllan BM
    J Morphol; 2015 Mar; 276(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 25328017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Focal adhesion kinase localizes to sites of cell-to-cell contact in vivo and increases apically in rat uterine luminal epithelium and the blastocyst at the time of implantation.
    Kaneko Y; Lecce L; Day ML; Murphy CR
    J Morphol; 2012 Jun; 273(6):639-50. PubMed ID: 22322452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The basal plasma membrane and lamina densa of uterine epithelial cells are both altered during early pregnancy and by ovarian hormones in the rat.
    Shion YL; Murphy CR
    Eur J Morphol; 1995 Jul; 33(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 8534579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Understanding the apical surface markers of uterine receptivity: pinopods-or uterodomes?
    Murphy CR
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Dec; 15(12):2451-4. PubMed ID: 11098008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differential alterations in the distribution of three phosphatase enzymes during the plasma membrane transformation of uterine epithelial cells in the rat.
    Bucci M; Murphy CR
    Cell Biol Int; 1999; 23(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 10527545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Maternal Hoxa10 is required for pinopod formation in the development of mouse uterine receptivity to embryo implantation.
    Bagot CN; Kliman HJ; Taylor HS
    Dev Dyn; 2001 Nov; 222(3):538-44. PubMed ID: 11747087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Apposition of uterine luminal epithelium during implantation in senescent golden hamsters.
    Parkening TA
    J Gerontol; 1979 May; 34(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 429766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The adherens junction is lost during normal pregnancy but not during ovarian hyperstimulated pregnancy.
    Dowland SN; Madawala RJ; Lindsay LA; Murphy CR
    Acta Histochem; 2016 Mar; 118(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 26738975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.