These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9080007)

  • 1. Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity.
    Palmeri TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Mar; 23(2):324-54. PubMed ID: 9080007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification.
    Nosofsky RM; Palmeri TJ
    Psychol Rev; 1997 Apr; 104(2):266-300. PubMed ID: 9127583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of similarity and practice on speeded classification response times and accuracies: further tests of an exemplar-retrieval model.
    Nosofsky RM; Alfonso-Reese LA
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):78-93. PubMed ID: 10087858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Memory-based automaticity in the discrimination of visual numerosity.
    Lassaline ME; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 May; 19(3):561-81. PubMed ID: 8501431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Similarity, identification, and categorization: comment on Ashby and Lee (1991).
    Nosofsky RM; Smith JE
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1992 Jun; 121(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 1534835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The modulating influence of category size on the classification of exception patterns.
    Homa D; Proulx MJ; Blair M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):425-43. PubMed ID: 17853225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infant categorization: memory for category-level and specific item information.
    Younger B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1990 Aug; 50(1):131-55. PubMed ID: 2398330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules.
    Nosofsky RM; Kruschke JK; McKinley SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Mar; 18(2):211-33. PubMed ID: 1532819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization.
    Palmeri TJ; Nosofsky RM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):197-235. PubMed ID: 11216316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of attention in automatization: does attention operate at encoding, or retrieval, or both?
    Boronat CB; Logan GD
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 9046868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Array training in a categorization task.
    Homa D; Powell D; Ferguson R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 23713978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of theories on children's acquisition of family-resemblance categories.
    Krascum RM; Andrews S
    Child Dev; 1998 Apr; 69(2):333-46. PubMed ID: 9586209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactions of stimulus attributes, base rates, and feedback in recognition.
    Estes WK; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1075-95. PubMed ID: 8744956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for an age-independent process in category learning.
    Livingston KR; Andrews JK
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15985065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When induction meets memory: evidence for gradual transition from similarity-based to category-based induction.
    Fisher AV; Sloutsky VM
    Child Dev; 2005; 76(3):583-97. PubMed ID: 15892780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automaticity and preattentive processing.
    Treisman A; Vieira A; Hayes A
    Am J Psychol; 1992; 105(2):341-62. PubMed ID: 1621885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automaticity in rule-based and information-integration categorization.
    Hélie S; Waldschmidt JG; Ashby FG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1013-31. PubMed ID: 20436197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD; Cohen AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1160-73. PubMed ID: 14622053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting similarity and categorization from identification.
    Ashby FG; Lee WW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1991 Jun; 120(2):150-72. PubMed ID: 1830609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for knowledge-based category discrimination in infancy.
    Pauen S
    Child Dev; 2002; 73(4):1016-33. PubMed ID: 12146730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.