134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9080224)
1. Assessment of uterine receptivity prior to embryo transfer: a review of currently available imaging modalities.
Turnbull LW; Lesny P; Killick SR
Hum Reprod Update; 1995 Sep; 1(5):505-14. PubMed ID: 9080224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine zonal anatomy during in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
Lesny P; Killick SR; Tetlow RL; Manton DJ; Robinson J; Maguiness SD
Hum Reprod; 1999 Jun; 14(6):1593-8. PubMed ID: 10357982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasound of the uterus prior to embryo transfer.
Turnbull LW; Rice CF; Horsman A; Robinson J; Killick SR
Hum Reprod; 1994 Dec; 9(12):2438-43. PubMed ID: 7714172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A uterine ultrasonographic scoring system as a method for the prognosis of embryo implantation.
Baruffi RL; Contart P; Mauri AL; Petersen C; Felipe V; Garbellini E; Franco JG
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2002 Mar; 19(3):99-102. PubMed ID: 12005313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement of endometrial and uterine vascularity by transvaginal ultrasonography in predicting pregnancy outcome during frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.
Son JB; Jeong JE; Joo JK; Na YJ; Kim CW; Lee KS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1661-7. PubMed ID: 24888931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative Assessment of Endometrial Volume and Uterine Vascularity and Pregnancy Outcome in Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles.
Joo JK; Jeong JE; Kim CW; Lee KS
J Reprod Med; 2016; 61(3-4):133-8. PubMed ID: 27172635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound parameters measured on hCG day in the prediction of pregnancy during in vitro fertilization treatment.
Zhang T; He Y; Wang Y; Zhu Q; Yang J; Zhao X; Sun Y
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():66-71. PubMed ID: 27254812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of endometrial and subendometrial vasculature on the day of embryo transfer and prediction of pregnancy during fresh in vitro fertilization cycles.
Kim A; Jung H; Choi WJ; Hong SN; Kim HY
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 53(3):360-5. PubMed ID: 25286791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of changes in utero-ovarian arterial impedance during the peri-implantation period by Doppler sonography in women undergoing assisted reproduction.
Chien LW; Lee WS; Au HK; Tzeng CR
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 23(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 15133803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Sonographic aspects in the study of endometrial receptivity in women undergoing in vitro fertilization].
Salzillo PL; Salzillo ME; Iannella I; Cobellis L; Colacurci N
Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Aug; 62(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 20827244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uterine peristalsis exerts control over fluid migration after mock embryo transfer.
Zhu L; Xiao L; Che HS; Li YP; Liao JT
Hum Reprod; 2014 Feb; 29(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 24277748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colour Doppler assessment of ascendent uterine artery perfusion in an in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer programme after pituitary desensitization and ovarian stimulation with human recombinant follicle stimulating hormone.
Bloechle M; Schreiner T; Küchler I; Schürenkämper P; Lisse K
Hum Reprod; 1997 Aug; 12(8):1772-7. PubMed ID: 9308810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The embryo versus endometrium controversy revisited as it relates to predicting pregnancy outcome in in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles.
Schwartz LB; Chiu AS; Courtney M; Krey L; Schmidt-Sarosi C
Hum Reprod; 1997 Jan; 12(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 9043900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sonographic appearance of the endometrium: the predictive value for the outcome of in-vitro fertilization in stimulated cycles.
Khalifa E; Brzyski RG; Oehninger S; Acosta AA; Muasher SJ
Hum Reprod; 1992 May; 7(5):677-80. PubMed ID: 1639988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing uterine receptivity in 2001: ultrasonographic glances at the new millennium.
Fanchin R
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2001 Sep; 943():185-202. PubMed ID: 11594540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging the endometrium: are there predictors of uterine receptivity?
Pierson RA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2003 May; 25(5):360-8. PubMed ID: 12738977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ovarian response is a better predictor of clinical pregnancy rate following embryo transfer than is thin endometrium or presence of an endometrioma.
Coelho Neto MA; Martins WP; Lima ML; Barbosa MA; Nastri CO; Ferriani RA; Navarro PA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):501-5. PubMed ID: 25914103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship of the individual uterine size and the endometrial thickness in stimulated cycles.
Strohmer H; Obruca A; Radner KM; Feichtinger W
Fertil Steril; 1994 May; 61(5):972-5. PubMed ID: 8174740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of endometrial volume by three-dimensional ultrasound prior to embryo transfer: clues to endometrial receptivity.
Raga F; Bonilla-Musoles F; Casañ EM; Klein O; Bonilla F
Hum Reprod; 1999 Nov; 14(11):2851-4. PubMed ID: 10548635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of endometrial receptivity for gestation in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization, using endometrial thickness and the endometrium-myometrium relative echogenicity coefficient.
Leibovitz Z; Grinin V; Rabia R; Degani S; Shapiro I; Tal J; Eibschitz I; Harari O; Paltieli Y; Aharoni A; Zeevi J; Ohel G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 14(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 10550880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
