These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Effect of activation sequence on ventricular refractoriness as determined by extrastimuli. Linker NJ; Dancy M; Malik M; Jones S; Ward DE Cardiovasc Res; 1990 Aug; 24(8):659-64. PubMed ID: 2224933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ventricular pacing threshold and refractoriness after defibrillation shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Yu JC; Lauer MR; Young C; Liem B; Peterson J; Ottoboni L; Sung RJ Am Heart J; 1996 Jun; 131(6):1121-6. PubMed ID: 8644590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The maximum effect of an increase in rate on human ventricular refractoriness. Morady F; Kadish AH; Toivonen LK; Kushner JA; Schmaltz S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Dec; 11(12):2223-34. PubMed ID: 2463610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Strength-interval curves in canine myocardium at very short cycle lengths. Alferness C; Bayly PV; Krassowska W; Daubert JP; Smith WM; Ideker RE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May; 17(5 Pt 1):876-81. PubMed ID: 7517522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of pacing rate and timing of defibrillation shock on the relation between the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogs. Chen PS; Feld GK; Mower MM; Peters BB J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Nov; 18(6):1555-63. PubMed ID: 1939961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of activation during ventricular fibrillation and following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in open-chest dogs. Chen PS; Wolf PD; Melnick SD; Danieley ND; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circ Res; 1990 Jun; 66(6):1544-60. PubMed ID: 2344664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid rates during bradycardia prolong ventricular refractoriness and facilitate ventricular tachycardia induction with cesium in dogs. Satoh T; Zipes DP Circulation; 1996 Jul; 94(2):217-27. PubMed ID: 8674181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological background of individual variability in electrical defibrillation efficacy. Murakawa Y; Yamashita T; Ajiki K; Sezaki K; Kanese Y; Omata M Am J Physiol; 1996 Sep; 271(3 Pt 2):H1094-8. PubMed ID: 8853346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differential effects of changes in local myocardial refractoriness on atrial and ventricular latency. Fananapazir L; Packer D; Prystowsky EN Circulation; 1996 Sep; 94(6):1364-71. PubMed ID: 8822994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety factor for precordial pacing: minimum current thresholds for pacing and for ventricular fibrillation by vulnerable-period stimulation. Voorhees WD; Foster KS; Geddes LA; Babbs CF Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 May; 7(3 Pt 1):356-60. PubMed ID: 6204286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of duration of rapid ventricular pacing on ventricular refractoriness in the presence of propafenone and lidocaine. Stark U; Stark G; Kasper K; Schwarzl I; Decrinis M; Pilger E; Tritthart HA Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 1):43-50. PubMed ID: 9121970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of postshock atrial pacing on atrial defibrillation outcome in the isolated sheep heart. Skanes AC; Gray RA; Zuur CL; Jalife J Circulation; 1998 Jul; 98(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 9665062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]