These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9080736)

  • 1. Marginal failures of amalgam and composite restorations.
    Mjör IA; Qvist V
    J Dent; 1997 Jan; 25(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 9080736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries.
    Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1998 May; 29(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 9693650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up.
    Fernández EM; Martin JA; Angel PA; Mjör IA; Gordan VV; Moncada GA
    Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 21537587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report.
    Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 9063229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings.
    Collins CJ; Bryant RW; Hodge KL
    J Dent; 1998 May; 26(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 9611936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: five-year results using sealants.
    Martin J; Fernandez E; Estay J; Gordan VV; Mjor IA; Moncada G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 22788726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
    Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Validity of decision criteria for replacement of fillings].
    Hannig C; Kupilas FJ; Wolkewitz M; Attin T
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2009; 119(4):328-38. PubMed ID: 19485073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Secondary caries around amalgam restorations.
    Pimenta LA; Navarro MF; Consolaro A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Sep; 74(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 7473273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations.
    Deligeorgi V; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Prim Dent Care; 2001 Jan; 8(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 11405031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom.
    Wilson NH; Burke FJ; Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 10332373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Replacement and initial placement of tooth colored restorations: a review and discussion.
    Owens BM
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1998 Jan; 78(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 9800555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits.
    Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany.
    Friedl KH; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(6):228-32. PubMed ID: 9028243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial.
    Moncada G; Fernández E; Martín J; Arancibia C; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 18505215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Italy.
    Mjör IA; Toffenetti F
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 1437690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of approximal restoration extension on the development of secondary caries.
    Kuper NK; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2012 Mar; 40(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 22226997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Jan; 55(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 9083578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.