These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9080739)

  • 1. Development of a novel system for assessing tooth and restoration wear.
    Chadwick RG; Mitchell HL; Cameron I; Hunter B; Tulley M
    J Dent; 1997 Jan; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 9080739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the accuracy and reproducibility of a replication technique for the manufacture of electroconductive replicas for use in quantitative clinical dental wear studies.
    Chadwick RG; Mitchell HL; Ward S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Jun; 29(6):540-5. PubMed ID: 12071922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel approach to evaluating the reproducibility of a replication technique for the manufacture of electroconductive replicas for use in quantitative clinical dental wear studies.
    Chadwick RG; Mitchell HL; Ward S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 15089938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Proposed Methodology to Assess the Accuracy of 3D Scanners and Casts and Monitor Tooth Wear Progression in Patients.
    Ahmed KE; Whitters J; Ju X; Pierce SG; MacLeod CN; Murray CA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):514-21. PubMed ID: 27611759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of tooth wear in patients with palatal erosion.
    Bartlett DW; Blunt L; Smith BG
    Br Dent J; 1997 Mar; 182(5):179-84. PubMed ID: 9134802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Replica techniques for in vivo studies of tooth surfaces and prosthetic materials.
    Ekfeldt A; Flöystrand F; Oilo G
    Scand J Dent Res; 1985 Dec; 93(6):560-5. PubMed ID: 3868017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mathematical shape matching as a tool in tooth wear assessment--development and conduct.
    Mitchell HL; Chadwick RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Dec; 25(12):921-8. PubMed ID: 9888227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and precision of a system for assessing severity of tooth wear.
    Haketa T; Baba K; Akishige S; Fueki K; Kino K; Ohyama T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):581-4. PubMed ID: 15543915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials.
    Haim M; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H; Koch R; Walter MH; Quaas S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 19548415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An universal and accurate replica technique for scanning electron microscope study in clinical dentistry.
    Lambrechts P; Vanherle G; Davidson C
    Microsc Acta; 1981 Sep; 85(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 7300696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
    Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 10709042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conduct of an algorithm in quantifying simulated palatal surface tooth erosion.
    Chadwick RG; Mitchell HL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 May; 28(5):450-6. PubMed ID: 11380785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical enamel surface changes following an intra-oral acidic challenge.
    Seong J; Virani A; Parkinson C; Claydon N; Hellin N; Newcombe RG; West N
    J Dent; 2015 Aug; 43(8):1013-20. PubMed ID: 25868879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of a 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess the accuracy of impression techniques.
    Shah S; Sundaram G; Bartlett D; Sherriff M
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):653-8. PubMed ID: 15476960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Replication of human occlusal tooth attrition surfaces for scanning electron microscopic study.
    Akpata ES; Winter PJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Jan; 18(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 2051248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Measuring the accuracy of various elastomeric impression materials using a CNC coordinate measuring device (Part 1)].
    Wichmann M; Borchers L; Limmroth E
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Aug; 45(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 2269183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.