These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9080793)

  • 1. Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning.
    Shanks DR; Johnstone T; Staggs L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1997 Feb; 50(1):216-52. PubMed ID: 9080793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploration of implicit artificial grammar learning in Parkinson's disease.
    Peigneux P; Meulemans T; Van der Linden M; Salmon E; Petit H
    Acta Neurol Belg; 1999 Jun; 99(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 10427353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instruction effects in implicit artificial grammar learning: a preference for grammaticality.
    Forkstam C; Elwér A; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1221():80-92. PubMed ID: 18561897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Information theory and artificial grammar learning: inferring grammaticality from redundancy.
    Jamieson RK; Nevzorova U; Lee G; Mewhort DJ
    Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 25828458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Independent judgment-linked and motor-linked forms of artificial grammar learning.
    Seger CA
    Conscious Cogn; 1998 Jun; 7(2):259-84. PubMed ID: 9690029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abstractionist and processing accounts of implicit learning.
    Johnstone T; Shanks DR
    Cogn Psychol; 2001 Feb; 42(1):61-112. PubMed ID: 11161417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implicit learning is intact in adult developmental dyslexic readers: evidence from the serial reaction time task and artificial grammar learning.
    Rüsseler J; Gerth I; Münte TF
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2006 Jul; 28(5):808-27. PubMed ID: 16723326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between the structural mere exposure effect and the implicit learning process.
    Newell BR; Bright JE
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Nov; 54(4):1087-104. PubMed ID: 11765734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intentional control based on familiarity in artificial grammar learning.
    Wan L; Dienes Z; Fu X
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1209-18. PubMed ID: 18667335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An event-related fMRI study of artificial grammar learning in a balanced chunk strength design.
    Lieberman MD; Chang GY; Chiao J; Bookheimer SY; Knowlton BJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):427-38. PubMed ID: 15072678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What do animals learn in artificial grammar studies?
    Beckers GJL; Berwick RC; Okanoya K; Bolhuis JJ
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2017 Oct; 81(Pt B):238-246. PubMed ID: 28017840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge.
    Gomez RL; Gerken L
    Cognition; 1999 Mar; 70(2):109-35. PubMed ID: 10349760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Affective discrimination and the implicit learning process.
    Manza L; Bornstein RF
    Conscious Cogn; 1995 Dec; 4(4):399-409. PubMed ID: 8750415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impaired artificial grammar learning in agrammatism.
    Christiansen MH; Louise Kelly M; Shillcock RC; Greenfield K
    Cognition; 2010 Sep; 116(3):382-93. PubMed ID: 20605017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rule and similarity in grammar: their interplay and individual differences in the brain.
    Hauser MF; Hofmann J; Opitz B
    Neuroimage; 2012 May; 60(4):2019-26. PubMed ID: 22369994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Violations of implicit rules elicit an early negativity in the event-related potential.
    Schankin A; Hagemann D; Danner D; Hager M
    Neuroreport; 2011 Sep; 22(13):642-5. PubMed ID: 21817929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of control groups in artificial grammar learning.
    Reber R; Perruchet P
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jan; 56(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 12587897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fluency does not express implicit knowledge of artificial grammars.
    Scott RB; Dienes Z
    Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):372-88. PubMed ID: 19932473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning.
    Dienes Z; Broadbent D; Berry D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Sep; 17(5):875-87. PubMed ID: 1834769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is implicit learning spared in amnesia? Rule abstraction and item familiarity in artificial grammar learning.
    Channon S; Shanks D; Johnstone T; Vakili K; Chin J; Sinclair E
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(12):2185-97. PubMed ID: 12208014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.