These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9080793)

  • 21. Intact implicit learning in schizophrenia.
    Danion JM; Meulemans T; Kauffmann-Muller F; Vermaat H
    Am J Psychiatry; 2001 Jun; 158(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 11384904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measuring strategic control in artificial grammar learning.
    Norman E; Price MC; Jones E
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1920-9. PubMed ID: 21824790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intact artificial grammar learning in patients with cerebellar degeneration and advanced Parkinson's disease.
    Witt K; Nühsman A; Deuschl G
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(9):1534-40. PubMed ID: 11985834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information.
    Knowlton BJ; Squire LR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Jan; 22(1):169-81. PubMed ID: 8648284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The formation of structurally relevant units in artificial grammar learning.
    Perruchet P; Vinter A; Pacteau C; Gallego J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):485-503. PubMed ID: 12047055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Artificial Grammar Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.
    Gillis JU; Gul A; Fox A; Parikh A; Arbel Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):292-302. PubMed ID: 34860559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does stimulus appearance affect learning?
    Pothos EM; Chater N; Ziori E
    Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(2):275-99. PubMed ID: 16841782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differences in the types of musical regularity learnt in incidental- and intentional-learning conditions.
    Kuhn G; Dienes Z
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Oct; 59(10):1725-44. PubMed ID: 16945857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. AGSuite: Software to conduct feature analysis of artificial grammar learning performance.
    Cook MT; Chubala CM; Jamieson RK
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1639-1651. PubMed ID: 28597235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Surface features can deeply affect artificial grammar learning.
    Jiménez L; Mendes Oliveira H; Soares AP
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Apr; 80():102919. PubMed ID: 32200204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning.
    Beesley T; Wills AJ; Le Pelley ME
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Feb; 17(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 20081172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prior familiarity with components enhances unconscious learning of relations.
    Scott RB; Dienes Z
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):413-8. PubMed ID: 20096605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multiple regression analyses in artificial-grammar learning: the importance of control groups.
    Lotz A; Kinder A; Lachnit H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Mar; 62(3):576-84. PubMed ID: 18609384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. "Artificial grammar learning" in pigeons: a preliminary analysis.
    Herbranson WT; Shimp CP
    Learn Behav; 2003 Feb; 31(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 18450072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Two modes of transfer in artificial grammar learning.
    Tunney RJ; Altmann GT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):614-39. PubMed ID: 11394670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Applying an exemplar model to the artificial-grammar task: inferring grammaticality from similarity.
    Jamieson RK; Mewhort DJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Mar; 62(3):550-75. PubMed ID: 18609412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Using dual-task methodology to dissociate automatic from nonautomatic processes involved in artificial grammar learning.
    Hendricks MA; Conway CM; Kellogg RT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1491-500. PubMed ID: 23627281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Grammaticality is inferred from global similarity: A reply to Kinder (2010).
    Jamieson RK; Mewhort DJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Feb; 64(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 21279868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modes of knowledge acquisition and retrieval in artificial grammar learning.
    Poznanski Y; Tzelgov J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1495-515. PubMed ID: 20063258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Amnesia and the declarative/nondeclarative distinction: a recurrent network model of classification, recognition, and repetition priming.
    Kinder A; Shanks DR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Jul; 13(5):648-69. PubMed ID: 11506662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.