132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9081413)
1. [Dry view laser imager--a new economical photothermal imaging method].
Weberling R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):355-60. PubMed ID: 9081413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Digital X-ray mammography: comparison of the image quality achievable with a wet laser imager, a dry infrared laser imager and a dry laser imager using direct thermography].
Krug B; Stützer H; Zähringer M; Morgenroth C; Winnekendonk G; Gossmann A; Warm M; Lackner K
Rofo; 2005 Jul; 177(7):955-61. PubMed ID: 15973597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital film processing: a comparison of wet and dry processing methods.
Health Devices; 1998 Aug; 27(8):293-8. PubMed ID: 9743901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Documentation of medical images using a laser camera].
Weberling R
Rontgenblatter; 1989 Apr; 42(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 2711107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Fundamental study on stability of dry-processing imager system DRYPRO 722/SD-P].
Sonobe F; Toyooka K; Abe S; Tanaka T; Naka E; Fujisaki T; Nishimura K; Saitoh H; Mochizuki Y
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 12766281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Quality control of laser imagers].
Winkelbauer F; Ammann M; Gerstner N; Imhof H
Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):334-8. PubMed ID: 1457474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital x-ray systems. Part 1. An introduction to DX technologies and an evaluation of cassette DX systems.
Health Devices; 2001 Aug; 30(8):273-310. PubMed ID: 11544777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deciding when and if digital is right move.
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1995 Sep; Suppl():RF9-12. PubMed ID: 10159499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The stability of dry and wet laser imaging systems.
AlKhalifah K; Brindhaban A; Al-Ali H; Alhuraibi A
Radiol Technol; 2005; 76(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 15732890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vendors sell range of digital products.
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1995 Sep; Suppl():RF13-6. PubMed ID: 10159497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dry versus conventional laser imagers: film properties and image quality.
Gahleitner A; Kreuzer S; Schick S; Nowotny R; Breitenseher M; Solar P; Czerny C; Lang T; Imhof H
Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):871-5. PubMed ID: 10207495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital detectors in mammography. A technological overview.
Dhaenens F
JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 10859905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cassetteless digital x-ray systems.
Health Devices; 2004 Mar; 33(3):73-99. PubMed ID: 15124343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Documentation of digital image information--video or laser imager?].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Loose R; Jaschke W; Georgi M
Rofo; 1988 Jul; 149(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 2840718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing brain tumor resection. Midfield interventional MR imaging.
Alexander E
Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2001 Nov; 11(4):659-72. PubMed ID: 11995421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Specific features of monitoring the characteristics of digital X-ray diagnostic systems].
Zelikman MI
Med Tekh; 2002; (5):3-6. PubMed ID: 12512272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Taking digital imaging to the next level: challenges and opportunities.
Hobbs WC
Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(2):16-20. PubMed ID: 15098897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Simplified radiographic slide production utilizing a laser imager and personal computer].
Hiromura T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 May; 56(6):436. PubMed ID: 8710469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct radiography can boost radiology productivity, cut costs.
Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1998 Mar; 3(3):38-42. PubMed ID: 10178786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
