These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9081998)

  • 1. Perception of facial attractiveness by patients, peers, and professionals.
    Phillips C; Griffin T; Bennett E
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 9081998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians.
    Cochrane SM; Cunningham SJ; Hunt NP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 10895644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychologic implications of orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal Class II or Class ill malocclusion.
    Gerzanic L; Jagsch R; Watzke IM
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 12099319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
    Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occlusal perceptions of children seeking orthodontic treatment: impact of ethnicity and socioeconomic status.
    Reichmuth M; Greene KA; Orsini MG; Cisneros GJ; King GJ; Kiyak HA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):575-82. PubMed ID: 16286204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceived relative attractiveness of facial profiles with varying degrees of skeletal anomalies.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 May; 66(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 15959632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness.
    Tulloch C; Phillips C; Dann C
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 8301165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Panel perception of change in facial aesthetics following orthodontic treatment in adolescents.
    Kiekens RM; Maltha JC; van 't Hof MA; Straatman H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 18263888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles.
    Işiksal E; Hazar S; Akyalçin S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16443472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.
    Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
    Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the influence of lower facial profile convexity on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 22883980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of patients requiring orthognathic treatment who subsequently refused or accepted surgery.
    Kindelan JD; Sheard CE; Nashed RR
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1998; 13(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 9743644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facial attractiveness and abnormality of nasal reconstruction patients and controls assessed by laypersons.
    Moolenburgh SE; Mureau MA; Hofer SO
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008 Jun; 61(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 18222114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.