196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9082009)
1. Subjective evaluation of profile prediction using video imaging.
Giangreco TA; Forbes DP; Jacobson RS; Kallal RH; Moretti RJ; Marshall SD
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9082009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting soft tissue changes in mandibular advancement surgery: a comparison of two video imaging systems.
Syliangco ST; Sameshima GT; Kaminishi RM; Sinclair PM
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(5):337-46. PubMed ID: 9347107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery.
Magro-Filho O; Magro-Ernica N; Queiroz TP; Aranega AM; Garcia IR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):452.e1-5; discussion 452-3. PubMed ID: 20362896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of video imaging in mandibular surgery.
Carter AC; Larson BE; Guenthner TA
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):289-300. PubMed ID: 9456606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subjective evaluation of video image profile prediction.
Giangreco TA; Forbes D; Jacobson RS; Kallal RH; Moretti RJ; Marshall SD
Northwest Dent Res; 1996; 6(2):9-13. PubMed ID: 9487921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of video imaging prediction in soft tissue outcome after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
Lu CH; Ko EW; Huang CS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 12618973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting soft tissue changes in maxillary impaction surgery: a comparison of two video imaging systems.
Sameshima GT; Kawakami RK; Kaminishi RM; Sinclair PM
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(5):347-54. PubMed ID: 9347108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction accuracy of soft tissue profile in orthognathic surgery.
Mankad B; Cisneros GJ; Freeman K; Eisig SB
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 10337247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of current prediction imaging programs.
Smith JD; Thomas PM; Proffit WR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 May; 125(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 15127020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of computerized video imaging in predicting adult extraction treatment outcomes.
Le TN; Sameshima GT; Grubb JE; Sinclair PM
Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):391-9. PubMed ID: 9770096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people.
Romani KL; Agahi F; Nanda R; Zernik JH
Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 8214785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of video imaging on patients' perceptions and expectations.
Phillips C; Hill BJ; Cannac C
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 7486240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subjective evaluation of the accuracy of video imaging prediction following orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients.
Chew MT; Koh CH; Sandham A; Wong HB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Feb; 66(2):291-6. PubMed ID: 18201611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computers and the orthodontist.
Weekes WT
Aust Orthod J; 1993 Oct; 13(1):47. PubMed ID: 16429860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Video imaging: techniques for superimposition of cephalometric radiography and profile images.
Sarver DM; Johnston MW
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1990; 5(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 2135601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two imaging programs in predicting the soft tissue changes with mandibular advancement surgery.
Ravindranath S; Krishnaswamy NR; Sundaram V
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 22299108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical prediction reliability: a comparison of two computer software systems.
Aharon PA; Eisig S; Cisneros GJ
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 9456619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
