These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9082009)

  • 1. Subjective evaluation of profile prediction using video imaging.
    Giangreco TA; Forbes DP; Jacobson RS; Kallal RH; Moretti RJ; Marshall SD
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9082009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting soft tissue changes in mandibular advancement surgery: a comparison of two video imaging systems.
    Syliangco ST; Sameshima GT; Kaminishi RM; Sinclair PM
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(5):337-46. PubMed ID: 9347107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery.
    Magro-Filho O; Magro-Ernica N; Queiroz TP; Aranega AM; Garcia IR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):452.e1-5; discussion 452-3. PubMed ID: 20362896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of video imaging in mandibular surgery.
    Carter AC; Larson BE; Guenthner TA
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):289-300. PubMed ID: 9456606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective evaluation of video image profile prediction.
    Giangreco TA; Forbes D; Jacobson RS; Kallal RH; Moretti RJ; Marshall SD
    Northwest Dent Res; 1996; 6(2):9-13. PubMed ID: 9487921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of video imaging prediction in soft tissue outcome after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
    Lu CH; Ko EW; Huang CS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 12618973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting soft tissue changes in maxillary impaction surgery: a comparison of two video imaging systems.
    Sameshima GT; Kawakami RK; Kaminishi RM; Sinclair PM
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(5):347-54. PubMed ID: 9347108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction accuracy of soft tissue profile in orthognathic surgery.
    Mankad B; Cisneros GJ; Freeman K; Eisig SB
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 10337247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of current prediction imaging programs.
    Smith JD; Thomas PM; Proffit WR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 May; 125(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 15127020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of computerized video imaging in predicting adult extraction treatment outcomes.
    Le TN; Sameshima GT; Grubb JE; Sinclair PM
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):391-9. PubMed ID: 9770096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people.
    Romani KL; Agahi F; Nanda R; Zernik JH
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 8214785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of video imaging on patients' perceptions and expectations.
    Phillips C; Hill BJ; Cannac C
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 7486240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subjective evaluation of the accuracy of video imaging prediction following orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients.
    Chew MT; Koh CH; Sandham A; Wong HB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Feb; 66(2):291-6. PubMed ID: 18201611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computers and the orthodontist.
    Weekes WT
    Aust Orthod J; 1993 Oct; 13(1):47. PubMed ID: 16429860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Video imaging: techniques for superimposition of cephalometric radiography and profile images.
    Sarver DM; Johnston MW
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1990; 5(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 2135601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two imaging programs in predicting the soft tissue changes with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Ravindranath S; Krishnaswamy NR; Sundaram V
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 22299108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical prediction reliability: a comparison of two computer software systems.
    Aharon PA; Eisig S; Cisneros GJ
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 9456619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.