These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9082102)

  • 1. [Intradiscal pressure forces on cervical intervertebral discs in physiologic and pathologic conditions. In vitro study].
    Pospiech J; Wilke HJ; Claes LE; Stolke D
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1996; 381(6):303-8. PubMed ID: 9082102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intradiscal pressure recordings in the cervical spine.
    Pospiech J; Stolke D; Wilke HJ; Claes LE
    Neurosurgery; 1999 Feb; 44(2):379-84; discussion 384-5. PubMed ID: 9932892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion.
    Eck JC; Humphreys SC; Lim TH; Jeong ST; Kim JG; Hodges SD; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2431-4. PubMed ID: 12435970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro disc pressure profiles below scoliosis fusion constructs.
    Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2134-42. PubMed ID: 18794754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Chang UK; Kim DH; Lee MC; Willenberg R; Kim SH; Lim J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Jul; 7(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17633485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems.
    Sato K; Kikuchi S; Yonezawa T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Dec; 24(23):2468-74. PubMed ID: 10626309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intradiscal pressure measurements in normal discs, compressed discs and compressed discs treated with axial posterior disc distraction: an experimental study on the rabbit lumbar spine model.
    Guehring T; Unglaub F; Lorenz H; Omlor G; Wilke HJ; Kroeber MW
    Eur Spine J; 2006 May; 15(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 16133080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relevance of using a compressive preload in the cervical spine: an experimental and numerical simulating investigation.
    Barrey C; Rousseau MA; Persohn S; Campana S; Perrin G; Skalli W
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():S155-65. PubMed ID: 25845316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intradiscal pressure in the degenerated porcine intervertebral disc.
    Holm S; Ekström L; Kaigle Holm A; Hansson T
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2007; 20(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 17364093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro animal study of the biomechanical responses of anulus fibrosus with aging.
    Park C; Kim YJ; Lee CS; An K; Shin HJ; Lee CH; Kim CH; Shin JW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(10):E259-65. PubMed ID: 15897815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Posterior facet load changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.
    Hussain M; Natarajan RN; Chaudhary G; An HS; Andersson GB
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 22652989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
    Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ranges of Cervical Intervertebral Disc Deformation During an In Vivo Dynamic Flexion-Extension of the Neck.
    Yu Y; Mao H; Li JS; Tsai TY; Cheng L; Wood KB; Li G; Cha TD
    J Biomech Eng; 2017 Jun; 139(6):0645011-7. PubMed ID: 28334358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical concepts for disc regeneration.
    Schnake KJ; Putzier M; Haas NP; Kandziora F
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Aug; 15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S354-60. PubMed ID: 16835733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Internal stress distribution in cervical intervertebral discs: the influence of an artificial cervical joint and simulated anterior interbody fusion.
    Wigfield CC; Skrzypiec D; Jackowski A; Adams MA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Oct; 16(5):441-9. PubMed ID: 14526192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kretzer RM; Hsu W; Hu N; Umekoji H; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E778-85. PubMed ID: 22228326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study.
    Weinhoffer SL; Guyer RD; Herbert M; Griffith SL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Mar; 20(5):526-31. PubMed ID: 7604320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of chondroitinase ABC on intradiscal pressure in sheep: an in vivo study.
    Sasaki M; Takahashi T; Miyahara K; Hirose aT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(5):463-8. PubMed ID: 11242372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The biomechanics of hyperextension injuries of the subaxial cervical spine].
    Stein G; Meyer C; Ingenhoff L; Bredow J; Müller LP; Eysel P; Schiffer G
    Unfallchirurg; 2017 Jul; 120(7):590-594. PubMed ID: 27220520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A minimally disruptive technique for measuring intervertebral disc pressure in vitro: application to the cervical spine.
    Cripton PA; Dumas GA; Nolte LP
    J Biomech; 2001 Apr; 34(4):545-9. PubMed ID: 11266680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.