These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9082826)

  • 21. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants.
    Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation.
    Vincenti V; Pasanisi E; Guida M; Di Trapani G; Sanna M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18259080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Postoperative results for adults and children implanted with the Clarion device.
    Battmer RD; Lenarz T; Allum-Mecklenburg DJ; Strauss-Schier A; Gnadeberg D; Rost U
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():254-5. PubMed ID: 7668658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Blink reflex and auditory speech perception in prelingually cochlear-implanted children.
    Emamdjomeh H; Shafaghat L; Abbassalipour P; Hassanzadeh S; Alaeddini F; Farhadi M; Daneshi A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Apr; 125(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 15823805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value.
    Rotteveel LJ; Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children.
    Colletti L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):943-6. PubMed ID: 17712673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei C; Cao K; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Technique and indications for the French multichannel cochlear implant "Chorimac-12" for total deafness rehabilitation.
    Chouard CH; Fugain C; Meyer B
    Am J Otol; 1985 Jul; 6(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 3839632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS; Finley CC; Lawson DT; Wolford RD; Eddington DK; Rabinowitz WM
    Nature; 1991 Jul; 352(6332):236-8. PubMed ID: 1857418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Refractory recovery function of electrical auditory on the survival auditory nerve in cochlear implant recipients].
    Xi X; Ji F; Han DY; Huang DL; Hong MD; Yang WY
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 15195587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cochlear implant hearing performance at the University of Minnesota.
    Kimberley BP; Lee A; Scheller L; Levine S; Adams G; Nelson DA
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2921782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Results with the currently used cochlear implant.
    Ito J; Takagi A; Kawano M; Takahashi H; Honjo I
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():298-300. PubMed ID: 7668678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant: preliminary observations.
    Hirshorn MS; Mecklenburg DJ; Brimacombe JA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Apr; 23(2):27-33. PubMed ID: 3755172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Longitudinal changes in children's speech and voice physiology after cochlear implantation.
    Higgins MB; McCleary EA; Carney AE; Schulte L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 12598813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of cochlear implant electrode deactivation on speech perception and in predicting device failure.
    Zeitler DM; Lalwani AK; Roland JT; Habib MG; Gudis D; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 18833018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cochlear implants in post-lingually deafened patients.
    Hiraumi H; Tsuji J; Kanemaru S; Fujino K; Ito J
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Feb; (557):17-21. PubMed ID: 17453437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electrodographic analysis and field evaluation of the Speak coding strategy.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Lai WK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():354-6. PubMed ID: 7668703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.