245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9082855)
1. Skeletal and dental changes after maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition.
Sandikçioğlu M; Hazar S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Mar; 111(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 9082855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short-term treatment effects of quad-helix on maxillomandibular expansion in patients with maxillary incisor crowding.
Shundo I; Kobayashi Y; Endo T
Odontology; 2012 Jan; 100(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 21674183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A long-term evaluation of the mandibular Schwarz appliance and the acrylic splint expander in early mixed dentition patients.
O'Grady PW; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):202-13. PubMed ID: 16905065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deciduous dentition-anchored rapid maxillary expansion in crossbite and non-crossbite mixed dentition patients: reaction of the permanent first molar.
Cozzani M; Rosa M; Cozzani P; Siciliani G
Prog Orthod; 2003; 4():15-22. PubMed ID: 12887575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of sagittal and vertical effects between bonded rapid and slow maxillary expansion procedures.
Akkaya S; Lorenzon S; Uçem TT
Eur J Orthod; 1999 Apr; 21(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 10327741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arch dimension changes from successful slow maxillary expansion of unilateral posterior crossbite.
Wong CA; Sinclair PM; Keim RG; Kennedy DB
Angle Orthod; 2011 Jul; 81(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 21306221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dentofacial changes from fan-type rapid maxillary expansion vs traditional rapid maxillary expansion in early mixed dentition.
Çörekçi B; Göyenç YB
Angle Orthod; 2013 Sep; 83(5):842-50. PubMed ID: 23387338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Arch width changes with a rapid maxillary expansion appliance anchored to the primary teeth.
Cozzani M; Guiducci A; Mirenghi S; Mutinelli S; Siciliani G
Angle Orthod; 2007 Mar; 77(2):296-302. PubMed ID: 17319765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of different treatment techniques for posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition.
Erdinç AE; Ugur T; Erbay E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):287-300. PubMed ID: 10474101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of a modified RME appliance with other appliances for transverse maxillary expansion.
Weyrich C; Noss M; Lisson JA
J Orofac Orthop; 2010 Jul; 71(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 20676813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of the dentoskeletal effects of slow maxillary expansion from the mixed to the permanent dentition.
Esenlik E; Rübendüz M
Aust Orthod J; 2015 May; 31(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26219141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment response and stability of slow maxillary expansion using Haas, hyrax, and quad-helix appliances: a retrospective study.
Huynh T; Kennedy DB; Joondeph DR; Bollen AM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 19732666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cephalometric and dental arch changes to Haas-type rapid maxillary expander anchored to deciduous vs permanent molars: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
Cerruto C; Ugolini A; Di Vece L; Doldo T; Caprioglio A; Silvestrini-Biavati A
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):385-393. PubMed ID: 28397083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term adaptations to changes in the transverse dimension in children and adolescents: an overview.
McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4 Suppl):S71-4. PubMed ID: 16644422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Skeletal alterations associated with the use of bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance.
Rossi Md; Rossi Ad; Abrão J
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 21861035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid maxillary expansion in the deciduous and mixed dentition evaluated through posteroanterior cephalometric analysis.
da Silva Filho OG; Montes LA; Torelly LF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Mar; 107(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 7879759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dentoskeletal effects of a removable appliance for expansion of the maxillary arch: a postero-anterior cephalometric study.
Defraia E; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Tollaro I
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 17971351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of long-term stability of maxillary dental arch dimensions in patients treated with a transpalatal arch followed by fixed appliances.
Raucci G; Elyasi M; Pachêco-Pereira C; Grassia V; d'Apuzzo F; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():24. PubMed ID: 26215180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Arch perimeter changes on rapid palatal expansion.
Adkins MD; Nanda RS; Currier GF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Mar; 97(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 2178393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the dental and skeletal effects of two different rapid palatal expansion appliances for the correction of the maxillary asymmetric transverse discrepancies.
Farronato G; Giannini L; Galbiati G; Maspero C
Minerva Stomatol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):45-55. PubMed ID: 22402295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
