These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9082867)
1. [Circulatory reactions under spinal anesthesia. The catheter technique versus the single dose procedure]. Holst D; Möllmann M; Karmann S; Wendt M Anaesthesist; 1997 Jan; 46(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 9082867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of haemodynamic changes in patients undergoing unilateral and bilateral spinal anaesthesia. Akhtar MN; Tariq S; Abbas N; Murtaza G; Nadeem Naqvi SM J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2012 Dec; 22(12):747-50. PubMed ID: 23217477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study. Aksoy M; Dostbil A; Ince I; Ahiskalioglu A; Alici HA; Aydin A; Kilinc OO BMC Anesthesiol; 2014; 14():99. PubMed ID: 25414593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized controlled trial comparing haemodynamic stability in elderly patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia at L5, S1 versus spinal anaesthesia at L3, 4 at a tertiary African hospital. Mung'ayi V; Mbaya K; Sharif T; Kamya D Afr Health Sci; 2015 Jun; 15(2):466-79. PubMed ID: 26124793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The anaesthetic and recovery profile of two concentrations (0.25% and 0.50%), of intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine for combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anaesthesia in patients undergoing modified Stark method caesarean delivery: a double blinded randomized trial. D'Ambrosio A; Spadaro S; Mirabella L; Natale C; Cotoia A; De Capraris A; Menga R; Salatto P; Malvasi A; Brizzi A; Tinelli A; Dambrosio M; Cinnella G Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2013 Dec; 17(23):3229-36. PubMed ID: 24338466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single shot spinal anaesthesia with hypobaric bupivacaine for hip fracture repair surgery in the elderly. Randomized, double blinded comparison of 3.75 mg vs. 7.5 mg. Errando CL; Soriano-Bru JL; Peiró CM; Ubeda J Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2014 Dec; 61(10):541-8. PubMed ID: 25236946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Block distribution and cardiovascular effects of unilateral spinal anaesthesia by 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. A clinical comparison with bilateral spinal block. Casati A; Fanelli G; Beccaria P; Aldegheri G; Berti M; Senatore R; Torri G Minerva Anestesiol; 1998; 64(7-8):307-12. PubMed ID: 9796239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Continuous spinal anesthesia versus continuous epidural anesthesia in surgery of the lower extremities. A prospective randomized study]. Kashanipour A; Strasser K; Klimscha W; Taslimi R; Aloy A; Semsroth M Reg Anaesth; 1991 Aug; 14(5):83-7. PubMed ID: 1822599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the effects and complications of unilateral spinal anesthesia versus standard spinal anesthesia in lower-limb orthopedic surgery. Moosavi Tekye SM; Alipour M Braz J Anesthesiol; 2014; 64(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 24907876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is continuous spinal analgesia via an epidural catheter appropriate after accidental subarachnoid administration of 15 mL of bupivacaine 0.1% containing fentanyl 2 micrograms/mL? Ng A; Shah J; Smith G Int J Obstet Anesth; 2004 Apr; 13(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 15321415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anaesthetic and haemodynamic effects of continuous spinal versus continuous epidural anaesthesia with prilocaine. Reisli R; Celik J; Tuncer S; Yosunkaya A; Otelcioglu S Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 12553385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of continuous spinal with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia using plain bupivacaine 0.5% in trauma patients. Wilhelm S; Standl T; Burmeister M; Kessler G; Schulte am Esch J Anesth Analg; 1997 Jul; 85(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 9212125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of the minimum initial intrathecal dose of isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine for the surgical repair of a proximal femoral fracture: A prospective, observational trial. Szucs S; Rauf J; Iohom G; Shorten GD Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Nov; 32(11):759-63. PubMed ID: 25693137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia in the elderly: single dose versus titration through a catheter. Favarel-Garrigues JF; Sztark F; Petitjean ME; Thicoïpé M; Lassié P; Dabadie P Anesth Analg; 1996 Feb; 82(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 8561333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Single-shot spinal anesthesia versus continuous spinal anesthesia using the CoSPAN catheter]. Striebel HW; Hölzl M; Wessel A Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1993 Aug; 28(5):292-9. PubMed ID: 8373975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effectiveness and safety of unilateral spinal anaesthesia]. Karpel E; Marszołek P; Pawlak B; Wach E Anestezjol Intens Ter; 2009; 41(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 19517675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Continuous spinal anaesthesia using a standard epidural set for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Shenkman Z; Eidelman LA; Cotev S Can J Anaesth; 1997 Oct; 44(10):1042-6. PubMed ID: 9350361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia with 2% lidocaine in comparison to 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine]. Kamenik M; Paver-Erzen V; Tos L; Zabavnik Z; Krcevski-Skvarc N; Horvat I Anaesthesist; 2000 Jun; 49(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 10928254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Haemodynamic effects of unilateral spinal anesthesia in high risk patients. Chohan U; Afshan G; Hoda MQ; Mahmud S J Pak Med Assoc; 2002 Feb; 52(2):66-9. PubMed ID: 12073713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]