160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9083158)
1. Patterns of mammographically detected calcifications after breast-conserving therapy associated with tumor recurrence.
Dershaw DD; Giess CS; McCormick B; Borgen P; Liberman L; Abramson AF; Morris E
Cancer; 1997 Apr; 79(7):1355-61. PubMed ID: 9083158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic features of local recurrence after conservative surgery and radiation therapy: comparison with that of the primary tumor.
Günhan-Bilgen I; Oktay A
Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17453518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of rate of development and rate of change for benign and malignant breast calcifications at the lumpectomy bed.
Giess CS; Keating DM; Osborne MP; Mester J; Rosenblatt R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):789-93. PubMed ID: 10954468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic findings of recurrent breast cancer after lumpectomy and radiation therapy: comparison with the primary tumor.
Philpotts LE; Lee CH; Haffty BG; Lange RC; Tocino I
Radiology; 1996 Dec; 201(3):767-71. PubMed ID: 8939229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Time to development and imaging features of new calcifications in the treated breast after breast-conserving therapy.
Chang Sen LQ; Ko A; Patel MM; Leung JWT
Breast J; 2021 Oct; 27(10):761-767. PubMed ID: 34363281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic features of local recurrence in women who have undergone breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Liberman L; Van Zee KJ; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Samli B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):489-93. PubMed ID: 9016233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is postexcision, preradiation mammogram necessary in patients after breast-conserving surgery with negative margins.
Adkisson CD; McLaughlin SA; Vallow LA; Heckman MG; Diehl NN; Bagaria SP; Howe N; Gibson T; Pockaj B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):3205-11. PubMed ID: 23975292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic analysis of calcifications.
Bassett LW
Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 1732937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ipsilateral microcalcifications after breast-conserving surgery: is it possible to differentiate benign from malignant calcifications?
Heaney RM; Sweeney L; Flanagan F; O'Brien A; Smith C
Clin Radiol; 2022 Mar; 77(3):216-223. PubMed ID: 34973807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors associated with local recurrence of mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ in patients given breast-conserving therapy.
Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Lacerna MD; Balasubramaniam M; Martinez AA; Rebner M; Pettinga J; Frazier RC; Vicini FA
Cancer; 2000 Feb; 88(3):596-607. PubMed ID: 10649253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management of microcalcifications developing at the lumpectomy bed after conservative surgery and radiation therapy.
Günhan-Bilgen I; Oktay A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 17242247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simplifying Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification of mammograms with pure suspicious calcifications.
Menezes GL; Winter-Warnars GA; Koekenbier EL; Groen EJ; Verkooijen HM; Pijnappel RM
J Med Screen; 2018 Jun; 25(2):82-87. PubMed ID: 28691862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Local tumor recurrence following breast-conservation therapy: correlation of histopathologic findings with detection method and mammographic findings.
Giess CS; Keating DM; Osborne MP; Rosenblatt R
Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 10478253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Post-lumpectomy breast calcifications: Can original tumor features assist in determining need for biopsy?
Greenwood HI; Kelil T; Lobach IV; Fong V; Price ER
Clin Imaging; 2021 Jul; 75():16-21. PubMed ID: 33486147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stereotactic Biopsy of Segmental Breast Calcifications: Is Sampling of Anterior and Posterior Components Necessary?
Raj SD; Sedgwick EL; Severs FJ; Hilsenbeck SG; Wang T; Sepulveda KA
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jun; 23(6):682-6. PubMed ID: 27052522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calcium oxalate is associated with benign breast tissue. Can we avoid biopsy?
Winston JS; Yeh IT; Evers K; Friedman AK
Am J Clin Pathol; 1993 Nov; 100(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 8249886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recurrent cancer after breast-conserving surgery with radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features, method of detection, and stage of recurrence.
Pinsky RW; Rebner M; Pierce LJ; Ben-David MA; Vicini F; Hunt KA; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 17579163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Suspicious breast calcifications undergoing stereotactic biopsy in women ages 70 and over: Breast cancer incidence by BI-RADS descriptors.
Grimm LJ; Johnson DY; Johnson KS; Baker JA; Soo MS; Hwang ES; Ghate SV
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jun; 27(6):2275-2281. PubMed ID: 27752832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Positive Predictive Values of Categorization of Suspicious Calcifications Using the 4th and 5th Editions of BI-RADS.
Park GE; Kim SH; Lee JM; Kang BJ; Chae BJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Sep; 213(3):710-715. PubMed ID: 31063419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
