These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9083578)

  • 41. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings.
    Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries.
    Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1998 May; 29(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 9693650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark.
    Qvist V; Qvist J; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Oct; 48(5):305-11. PubMed ID: 2251919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani ; Zilm PS; Gully NJ
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17969286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Three restorative materials and topical fluoride gel used in xerostomic patients: a clinical comparison.
    Haveman CW; Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Carlson K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Feb; 134(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 12636121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits.
    Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations.
    Svanberg M; Mjör IA; Orstavik D
    J Dent Res; 1990 Mar; 69(3):861-4. PubMed ID: 2109000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Motives for placement and replacement of dental restoration].
    Franco EB; Pascotto RC
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 2135430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The age of restorations in situ.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA; Qvist V
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1994 Aug; 52(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 7985509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark.
    Qvist V; Thylstrup A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1986 Dec; 44(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 3469862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations.
    Eltahlah D; Lynch CD; Chadwick BL; Blum IR; Wilson NHF
    J Dent; 2018 May; 72():1-7. PubMed ID: 29522787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries.
    Swift EJ; Bader JD; Shugars DA
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):227-9. PubMed ID: 10332370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The preventive effect of glass ionomer cement restorations on secondary caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ge KX; Quock R; Chu CH; Yu OY
    Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):e1-e17. PubMed ID: 37838608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Composite resin restorations: a cross-sectional survey of placement and replacement in Jordan.
    Al-Negrish AR
    Int Dent J; 2002 Dec; 52(6):461-8. PubMed ID: 12553402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.