These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9083802)

  • 1. Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig.
    Mitchell A; Miller JM; Finger PA; Heller JW; Raphael Y; Altschuler RA
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):30-43. PubMed ID: 9083802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Delayed electrical stimulation and BDNF application following induced deafness in rats.
    Song BN; Li YX; Han DM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Feb; 129(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 18607918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does electrical stimulation of deaf cochleae prevent spiral ganglion degeneration?
    Li L; Parkins CW; Webster DB
    Hear Res; 1999 Jul; 133(1-2):27-39. PubMed ID: 10416862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens.
    Shepherd RK; Matsushima J; Martin RL; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):150-66. PubMed ID: 7737922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chronic electrical stimulation does not prevent spiral ganglion cell degeneration in deafened guinea pigs.
    Agterberg MJ; Versnel H; de Groot JC; van den Broek M; Klis SF
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):169-79. PubMed ID: 20600740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protective effect of electrical stimulation in the deafened guinea pig cochlea.
    Hartshorn DO; Miller JM; Altschuler RA
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1991 Mar; 104(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 1902931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
    Shepherd RK; Hatsushika S; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of an electrode for the artificial cochlear sensory epithelium.
    Tona Y; Inaoka T; Ito J; Kawano S; Nakagawa T
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):106-12. PubMed ID: 26299844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I: Normal hearing kittens.
    Ni D; Shepherd RK; Seldon HL; Xu SA; Clark GM; Millard RE
    Hear Res; 1992 Sep; 62(1):63-81. PubMed ID: 1429252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates.
    Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 88(1-2):124-42. PubMed ID: 8575988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Estimation of surviving auditory nerve by electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (FABR)--comparison between extra-cochlear stimulation and intra-cochlear stimulation].
    Hatsushika S; Funasaka S
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1989 Jul; 92(7):1005-11. PubMed ID: 2809867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures.
    Miller CA; Woodruff KE; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):85-99. PubMed ID: 8647749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Physiological and histopathological results.
    Shepherd RK; Clark GM; Black RC
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1983; 399():19-31. PubMed ID: 6316712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deafness alters auditory nerve fibre responses to cochlear implant stimulation.
    Sly DJ; Heffer LF; White MW; Shepherd RK; Birch MG; Minter RL; Nelson NE; Wise AK; O'Leary SJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 26(2):510-22. PubMed ID: 17650121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhanced survival of spiral ganglion cells after cessation of treatment with brain-derived neurotrophic factor in deafened guinea pigs.
    Agterberg MJ; Versnel H; van Dijk LM; de Groot JC; Klis SF
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 10(3):355-67. PubMed ID: 19365690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of wave I of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in the guinea pig.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Robinson BK
    Hear Res; 1993 Sep; 69(1-2):35-44. PubMed ID: 8226348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of long-duration current pulses to assess nerve survival.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Robinson BK
    Hear Res; 1994 Jul; 78(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 7961173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physiologic measures of electrically evoked auditory system responsiveness: effects of pathology and electrical stimulation.
    Miller JM
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():28-36; discussion 43-7. PubMed ID: 2069186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.