These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9084067)

  • 1. Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug.
    Pierre PJ; Vezina P
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1997 Feb; 129(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 9084067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. D1 dopamine receptor blockade prevents the facilitation of amphetamine self-administration induced by prior exposure to the drug.
    Pierre PJ; Vezina P
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1998 Jul; 138(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 9718285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of previous exposure to amphetamine on drug-induced locomotion and self-administration of a low dose of the drug.
    Vezina P; Pierre PJ; Lorrain DS
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Nov; 147(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 10591879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in amphetamine self-administration: the role of the central nucleus of the amygdala.
    Cain ME; Denehy ED; Bardo MT
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2008 Apr; 33(5):1149-61. PubMed ID: 17568395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Previous exposure to amphetamine increases incentive to obtain the drug: long-lasting effects revealed by the progressive ratio schedule.
    Lorrain DS; Arnold GM; Vezina P
    Behav Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 107(1-2):9-19. PubMed ID: 10628726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of the central nucleus of the amygdala to individual differences in amphetamine-induced hyperactivity.
    Cain ME; Coolon RA; Gill MJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 202(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 19447275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dopamine transporter, but not tyrosine hydroxylase, may be implicated in determining individual differences in behavioral sensitization to amphetamine.
    Dietz DM; Tapocik J; Gaval-Cruz M; Kabbaj M
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Oct; 86(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 16126238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in behavioral responses to novelty and amphetamine self-administration in male and female rats.
    Klebaur JE; Bevins RA; Segar TM; Bardo MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 2001 Jul; 12(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 11548112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novelty response and 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations: Differential prediction of locomotor and affective response to amphetamine in Sprague-Dawley rats.
    Garcia EJ; Cain ME
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Feb; 233(4):625-37. PubMed ID: 26564232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intranucleus accumbens amphetamine infusions enhance responding maintained by a stimulus complex paired with oral ethanol self-administration.
    Slawecki CJ; Samson HH; Chappell A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Dec; 58(4):1065-73. PubMed ID: 9408215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Locomotor response to novelty predicts a rat's propensity to self-administer nicotine.
    Suto N; Austin JD; Vezina P
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2001 Nov; 158(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 11702091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors that determine a propensity for cocaine-seeking behavior during abstinence in rats.
    Sutton MA; Karanian DA; Self DW
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2000 Jun; 22(6):626-41. PubMed ID: 10788762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of novelty on amphetamine self-administration in rats classified as high and low responders.
    Cain ME; Smith CM; Bardo MT
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Nov; 176(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 15502935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre-exposure of rats to amphetamine sensitizes self-administration of this drug under a progressive ratio schedule.
    Mendrek A; Blaha CD; Phillips AG
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1998 Feb; 135(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 9539267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in rats' reactivity to novelty and the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor effects of methamphetamine.
    Bevins RA; Peterson JL
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2004 Sep; 79(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 15388285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clozapine pre-treatment has a protracted hypolocomotor effect on the induction and expression of amphetamine sensitization.
    Herrera AS; Casanova JP; Gatica RI; Escobar F; Fuentealba JA
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2013 Dec; 47():1-6. PubMed ID: 23954739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Previous exposure to delta9-tetrahydrocannibinol enhances locomotor responding to but not self-administration of amphetamine.
    Cortright JJ; Lorrain DS; Beeler JA; Tang WJ; Vezina P
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 2011 Jun; 337(3):724-33. PubMed ID: 21389094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in amphetamine sensitization: dose-dependent effects.
    Hooks MS; Jones GH; Neill DB; Justice JB
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1992 Jan; 41(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 1539070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age and sex differences in the locomotor effect of repeated methylphenidate in rats classified as high or low novelty responders.
    Wooters TE; Dwoskin LP; Bardo MT
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Sep; 188(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 16896959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in response to novelty, amphetamine-induced activity and drug discrimination in rats.
    Bevins RA; Klebaur JE; Bardo MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Jun; 8(2-3):113-23. PubMed ID: 9833007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.