BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9084311)

  • 1. An evaluation of torque (moment) on implant/prosthesis with staggered buccal and lingual offset.
    Weinberg LA; Kruger B
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Jun; 16(3):252-65. PubMed ID: 9084311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of implant/prosthesis loading with four clinical variables.
    Weinberg LA; Kruger B
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(5):421-33. PubMed ID: 8595100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Therapeutic biomechanics concepts and clinical procedures to reduce implant loading. Part I.
    Weinberg LA
    J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(6):293-301. PubMed ID: 12498437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Stress analysis of the staggered and straight placement of implants in the mandibular posterior region under the localized load].
    Li Y; Zhou YM; Zhou ZP; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 42(6):365-7. PubMed ID: 17888256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of straight and staggered implant placement configurations.
    Itoh H; Caputo AA; Kuroe T; Nakahara H
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Feb; 24(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 14984145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone level changes at axial- and non-axial-positioned implants supporting fixed partial dentures. A 5-year retrospective longitudinal study.
    Koutouzis T; Wennström JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):585-90. PubMed ID: 17608740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support.
    Krekmanov L; Kahn M; Rangert B; Lindström H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 10874806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. External hexagon and internal hexagon in straight and offset implant placement: strain gauge analysis.
    Nishioka RS; de Vasconcellos LG; de Melo Nishioka LN
    Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):512-20. PubMed ID: 20009605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo horizontal bending moments on implants.
    Richter EJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):232-44. PubMed ID: 9581410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A 4-year prospective clinical and radiological study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols.
    Turkyilmaz I; Avci M; Kuran S; Ozbek EN
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 18031444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A biomechanical effect of wide implant placement and offset placement of three implants in the posterior partially edentulous region.
    Sato Y; Shindoi N; Hosokawa R; Tsuga K; Akagawa Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Jan; 27(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 10632839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.
    Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implant screw mechanics.
    McGlumphy EA; Mendel DA; Holloway JA
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 9421671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human ex vivo bone tissue strains around immediately-loaded implants supporting mandibular fixed prostheses.
    Kökat AM; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Akkocaoğlu M; Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Implant Dent; 2009 Apr; 18(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 19359867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.