These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9087013)

  • 1. Reflecting clinical practice through qualitative performance evaluations.
    Maguire D
    Neonatal Netw; 1997 Mar; 16(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 9087013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Employee performance: for the good of all.
    Topjian DF; Buck TF; Kozlowski R
    Nurs Manage; 2009 Apr; 40(4):24-9. PubMed ID: 19346921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ensuring the integrity of appraisal systems.
    Shaw S
    Nurs N Z; 2000 Feb; 6(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 11040689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Criteria-based performance appraisals.
    Lerch EM
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):28-30. PubMed ID: 6920625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the credibility of a clinical ladder review process: an interrater reliability study.
    Froman RD
    Nurs Outlook; 2001; 49(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 11182722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the clinical exemplar in performance appraisals.
    Black PJ
    Neonatal Netw; 1997 Aug; 16(5):73-8. PubMed ID: 9325873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ten commandments of peer review.
    Maguire D
    Neonatal Netw; 1998 Feb; 17(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 9526362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How evaluations can improve performance.
    DeSimone A
    RN; 1984 Jul; 47(7):15, 17. PubMed ID: 6564689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing staff performance in a rapidly changing service.
    Martin V
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2002 Mar; 8(10):30-3. PubMed ID: 11917611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Personnel evaluation in nursing].
    Sotomayor A
    Bol Col Prof Enferm P R; 1983 Jun; 9(34):9-13. PubMed ID: 6590066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anecdotal records improve evaluations.
    Marker CG
    Nurs Manage; 1986 Dec; 17(12):44-6. PubMed ID: 3641161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How am I doing and where am I going? Individual performance review in staff appraisal.
    Rowe H
    Prof Nurse; 1992 Feb; 7(5):288-91. PubMed ID: 1738776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality evaluations made easy and meaningful.
    Krystof L
    J Nurs Care Qual; 1996 Dec; 11(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 8987311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Creating a clinical practice development model.
    Haag-Heitman B; Kramer A
    Am J Nurs; 1998 Aug; 98(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 9711148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance management.
    Pulce R
    Semin Nurse Manag; 2002 Jun; 10(2):83. PubMed ID: 12180401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Nursing performance should be turned inwards].
    Portenier L; Baumberger D; Wittwer M
    Krankenpfl Soins Infirm; 2009; 102(12):22-3. PubMed ID: 20055312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Standards for performance appraisal of academic staff at a nursing college].
    Aucamp H; Muller M
    Curationis; 2000 Mar; 23(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 11140024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance appraisal of staff nurses - Part II. Analyzing the old and planning for the new.
    Bray KA
    Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(4):89-90. PubMed ID: 6925523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival kit for managers. 8. Staff appraisal and development.
    Pincus J
    Nurs Mirror; 1982 Nov; 155(21):47-9. PubMed ID: 6924342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance appraisal of CCU nurses.
    Huang SH; Dasher LA; Varner CF
    Nurs Manage; 1981 Oct; 12(10):50-5. PubMed ID: 6913847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.