These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9087902)

  • 1. Reliability and validity testing of three breastfeeding assessment tools.
    Riordan JM; Koehn M
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1997; 26(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 9087902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity and reliability of the infant breastfeeding assessment tool, the mother baby assessment tool, and the LATCH scoring system.
    Altuntas N; Turkyilmaz C; Yildiz H; Kulali F; Hirfanoglu I; Onal E; Ergenekon E; Koç E; Atalay Y
    Breastfeed Med; 2014 May; 9(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 24650352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of Lactation Assessment Tools Applied to Overweight and Obese Women.
    Chapman DJ; Doughty K; Mullin EM; Pérez-Escamilla R
    J Hum Lact; 2016 May; 32(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 26243754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool.
    Tomita A; Tahara-Sasagawa E; Yonezawa K; Usui Y; Haruna M
    Midwifery; 2023 Jun; 121():103670. PubMed ID: 37019001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mother-Infant Breastfeeding Progress Tool: a guide for education and support of the breastfeeding dyad.
    Johnson TS; Mulder PJ; Strube K
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2007; 36(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 17594406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the association of two breastfeeding assessment tools with breastfeeding problems and breastfeeding satisfaction.
    Schlomer JA; Kemmerer J; Twiss JJ
    J Hum Lact; 1999 Mar; 15(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10578773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maternal and professional assessment of breastfeeding.
    Adams D; Hewell S
    J Hum Lact; 1997 Dec; 13(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9429362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between breastfeeding self-efficacy and LATCH scores and affecting factors.
    Gerçek E; Sarıkaya Karabudak S; Ardıç Çelik N; Saruhan A
    J Clin Nurs; 2017 Apr; 26(7-8):994-1004. PubMed ID: 27272098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing validity and reliability of an instrument which measures maternal evaluation of breastfeeding.
    Riordan JM; Woodley G; Heaton K
    J Hum Lact; 1994 Dec; 10(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 7619277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool-Thai Version: Translation, Validity, and Reliability.
    Singhala K; Mills AC; Wong-Anuchit C
    J Hum Lact; 2022 May; 38(2):227-235. PubMed ID: 35259996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting breastfeeding duration using the LATCH breastfeeding assessment tool.
    Riordan J; Bibb D; Miller M; Rawlins T
    J Hum Lact; 2001 Feb; 17(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 11847847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of breastfeeding of very low birth weight infants: can we use the infant breastfeeding assessment tool?
    Furman L; Minich NM
    J Hum Lact; 2006 May; 22(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16684905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of the psychometric properties of breastfeeding assessment tools.
    Ho YJ; McGrath JM
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2010; 39(4):386-400. PubMed ID: 20629926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity and reliability of the neonatal skin condition score.
    Lund CH; Osborne JW
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2004; 33(3):320-7. PubMed ID: 15180195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability, Validity, and Minimal Detectable Change of Balance Evaluation Systems Test and Its Short Versions in Older Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study.
    Huang MH; Miller K; Smith K; Fredrickson K; Shilling T
    J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2016; 39(2):58-63. PubMed ID: 25695466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a physical performance and mobility examination.
    Winograd CH; Lemsky CM; Nevitt MC; Nordstrom TM; Stewart AL; Miller CJ; Bloch DA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1994 Jul; 42(7):743-9. PubMed ID: 8014350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Functional Movement Screen: a reliability study.
    Teyhen DS; Shaffer SW; Lorenson CL; Halfpap JP; Donofry DF; Walker MJ; Dugan JL; Childs JD
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2012 Jun; 42(6):530-40. PubMed ID: 22585621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and validity of the Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool in the Turkish population.
    Dolgun G; İnal S; Erdim L; Korkut S
    Midwifery; 2018 Feb; 57():47-53. PubMed ID: 29197786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interrater and test-retest reliability of two pediatric balance tests.
    Atwater SW; Crowe TK; Deitz JC; Richardson PK
    Phys Ther; 1990 Feb; 70(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 2296615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.