These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9088742)

  • 1. A comparison of binocular summation in the peripheral visual field in young and older patients.
    Pardhan S
    Curr Eye Res; 1997 Mar; 16(3):252-5. PubMed ID: 9088742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binocular summation in the fovea and peripheral field of anisometropic amblyopes.
    Pardhan S; Whitaker A
    Curr Eye Res; 2000 Jan; 20(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 10611713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of binocular summation in young and older patients.
    Pardhan S
    Curr Eye Res; 1996 Mar; 15(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 8654112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binocular summation to gratings in the peripheral field in older subjects is spatial frequency dependent.
    Pardhan S; Whitaker A
    Curr Eye Res; 2003 May; 26(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 12854058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of target size and eccentricity on binocular summation of reaction time in kinetic perimetry.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Inase M; Shimomura Y
    Vision Res; 2011 Jan; 51(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 21078335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regional variations in binocular summation across the visual field.
    Wood JM; Collins MJ; Carkeet A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jan; 12(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 1584616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Effect of stimulus size on binocular summation within the binocular visual field].
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Iwagaki A; Matsumoto F; Ohmure K; Shimomura Y
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Feb; 105(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 11235199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binocular summation of detection and resolution thresholds in the central visual field using parallel-line targets.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Shimomura Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 46(8):2810-5. PubMed ID: 16043854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results.
    Nelson-Quigg JM; Cello K; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2212-21. PubMed ID: 10892865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of background complexity on visual sensitivity and binocular summation using patterns with and without noise.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Inase M; Shimomura Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jan; 53(1):387-93. PubMed ID: 22167098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion using the head-mounted perimeter imo.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ayato Y; Shimomura Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210691. PubMed ID: 30653560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of rates of change between binocular and monocular visual fields.
    Chun YS; Shin JH; Park IK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jan; 56(1):451-7. PubMed ID: 25564449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The study on binocular visual field summation and its possible mechanism].
    Luo G; Jiang F; Liang J; Liu C; Wu DZ
    Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2002 Dec; 18(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 15515772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Properties of receptive field on binocular fusion stimulation in the central visual field.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Matsumoto F; Shimomura Y
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 240(9):743-7. PubMed ID: 12271372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision.
    Jampel HD; Friedman DS; Quigley H; Miller R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1059-67. PubMed ID: 11923247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binocular Interactions in Glaucoma Patients With Nonoverlapping Visual Field Defects: Contrast Summation, Rivalry, and Phase Combination.
    João CAR; Scanferla L; Jansonius NM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2021 Sep; 62(12):9. PubMed ID: 34505864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Ocular Dominance and Binocularity Are Reflected by the Population Receptive Field Properties.
    de Best PB; Raz N; Dumoulin SO; Levin N
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Nov; 59(13):5301-5311. PubMed ID: 30398621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The visual and driving performance of monocular and binocular heavy-duty truck drivers.
    McKnight AJ; Shinar D; Hilburn B
    Accid Anal Prev; 1991 Aug; 23(4):225-37. PubMed ID: 1883464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two eyes: square root 2 better than one?
    Simpson WA; Manahilov V; Shahani U
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 19406375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binocular recognition summation in the peripheral visual field: contrast and orientation dependence.
    Pardhan S
    Vision Res; 2003 May; 43(11):1249-55. PubMed ID: 12726831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.