These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography. Borg E Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of stimulable phosphor technology and conventional screen-film technology in pediatric scoliosis. Stringer DA; Cairns RA; Poskitt KJ; Bray H; Milner R; Kennedy B Pediatr Radiol; 1994; 24(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8008484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose. Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl HG; Molander B Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality for five modern chest radiography techniques: a modified FROC study with an anthropomorphic chest phantom. Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Lanhede B; Tylén U Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(9):1826-34. PubMed ID: 10602958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Use of a digital radiology system with phosphors in the assessment of thoracic diseases in bedside radiography]. Cuscianna G; Saguatti G; Serafini M; Baldari F; Ferrari G; Romagnoli R Radiol Med; 1996 Dec; 92(6):719-25. PubMed ID: 9122460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging performance of a digital storage phosphor system. Hillen W; Schiebel U; Zaengel T Med Phys; 1987; 14(5):744-51. PubMed ID: 3683303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine]. Peters PE; Dykstra DE; Wiesmann W; Schlüchtermann J; Adam D Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Experimental studies on image quality in conventional film screen system, digital phosphor storage plate mammography in mangnification technique and digital mammography in CCD-technique]. Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Bautz W Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):965-8. PubMed ID: 11199438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging: state of the art. Murphey MD; Quale JL; Martin NL; Bramble JM; Cook LT; Dwyer SJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Jan; 158(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 1727344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of monitoring materials on bedside chest radiographs with the most recent generation of storage phosphor plates: dose increase does not improve detection performance. Eisenhuber E; Stadler A; Prokop M; Fuchsjager M; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):216-21. PubMed ID: 12668747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques]. Busch HP Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]