These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images. Razavi M; Sayre JW; Taira RK; Simons M; Huang HK; Chuang KS; Rahbar G; Kangarloo H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing film and digital radiographs for reliability of pneumoconiosis classifications: a modeling approach. Sen A; Lee SY; Gillespie BW; Kazerooni EA; Goodsitt MM; Rosenman KD; Lockey JE; Meyer CA; Petsonk EL; Wang ML; Franzblau A Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 20207319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: a comparison of 2.5 K x 2 K soft-copy images vs digital hard-copy film. Brill PW; Winchester P; Cahill P; Lesser M; Durfee SM; Giess CS; Auld PA; Greenwald B Pediatr Radiol; 1996; 26(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 8657462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Interpretation of chest radiographs in the intensive care unit: a hard- versus soft-copy comparative study]. Bricault I; Bosson JL; Declety P; Lavagne P; Ferretti G J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 84(9):993-9. PubMed ID: 13679753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of paper print and soft copy reading in plain paediatric radiographs. Maydell AT; Andronikou S; Ackermann C; Bezuidenhout AF J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Oct; 53(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 19788481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of conventional film, CR hard copy and PACS soft copy images of the chest: analyses of ROC curves and inter-observer agreement. Weatherburn GC; Ridout D; Strickland NH; Robins P; Glastonbury CM; Curati W; Harvey C; Shadbolt C Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 12927664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms. Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and hard copy of computed radiography in full and two-thirds sizes in detection of interstitial lung disease. Kondoh H; Ikezoe J; Inamura K; Kuroda C; Kozuka T J Digit Imaging; 1994 Nov; 7(4):193-5. PubMed ID: 7858016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of digital radiographs with film radiographs for the classification of pneumoconiosis. Franzblau A; Kazerooni EA; Sen A; Goodsitt MM; Lee SY; Rosenman KD; Lockey JE; Meyer CA; Gillespie BW; Petsonk EL; Wang ML Acad Radiol; 2009 Jun; 16(6):669-77. PubMed ID: 19345120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique. Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reporting requirements for skeletal digital radiography: comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy presentation. O'Connor PJ; Davies AG; Fowler RC; Lintott DJ; Bury RF; Parkin GJ; Martinez D; Saifuddin A; Cowen AR Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):249-54. PubMed ID: 9530323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology. Salát D; Nikodemová D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):147-9. PubMed ID: 18321878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study. Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of bedside chest hard-copy screen-film versus hard- and soft-copy computed radiographs in a medical intensive care unit: receiver operating characteristic analysis. Kundel HL; Gefter W; Aronchick J; Miller W; Hatabu H; Whitfill CH; Miller W Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):859-63. PubMed ID: 9393548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Design and implementation of an integrated HIS-RIS-PACS system: our experience. Cammisa M; Guglielmi G; Zarrelli N; Pennelli O; Borello E; Piuri D; Conti P Radiol Med; 2004; 107(1-2):102-12. PubMed ID: 15031702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initial application of a geometric QA tool for integrated MV and kV imaging systems on three image guided radiotherapy systems. Mao W; Speiser M; Medin P; Papiez L; Solberg T; Xing L Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2335-41. PubMed ID: 21776767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Modular project of the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Preliminary operational experience. I]. Dalla Palma L; Ukovich W; Stacul F; Cuttin Zernich R; Carbi N; Giribona P Radiol Med; 1990; 80(1-2):9-17. PubMed ID: 2217948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A digital radiology imaging system: description and clinical evaluation. Templeton AW; Dwyer SJ; Cox GG; Lee KR; Johnson JA; Martin NL; Chang CH; Anderson WH; Hensley KS; Bialek J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Oct; 149(4):847-51. PubMed ID: 3498339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]