These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9089491)

  • 1. Evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system.
    Ellwood RP; Davies RM; Worthington HV
    J Periodontal Res; 1997 Feb; 32(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 9089491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dried human mandibles.
    Rawlinson A; Ellwood RP; Davies RM
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 10100038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of a C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars. Part III. Anatomic features revealed by digital subtraction radiography.
    Fan W; Fan B; Gutmann JL; Fan M
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1187-90. PubMed ID: 18793917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis of digital subtraction images: in vivo error of the method and effect of thresholding.
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Fourmousis I; Schmid G; Schild U; Lang NP
    J Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):967-74. PubMed ID: 9776024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ROI-based image registration for digital subtraction radiography.
    Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Huh KH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):523-9. PubMed ID: 16545718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative analysis of bone density in direct digital radiographs evaluated by means of computerized analysis of digital images.
    Morea C; Dominguez GC; Coutinho A; Chilvarquer I
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Sep; 39(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 20729185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital radiograph registration and subtraction: a useful tool for the evaluation of the progress of chronic apical periodontitis.
    Mikrogeorgis G; Lyroudia K; Molyvdas I; Nikolaidis N; Pitas I
    J Endod; 2004 Jul; 30(7):513-7. PubMed ID: 15220649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of three methods of geometric image reconstruction for digital subtraction radiography.
    Queiroz PM; Oliveira ML; Tanaka JL; Soares MG; Haiter-Neto F; Ono E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160120. PubMed ID: 27376702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of a new software in eliminating the angulation errors in digital subtraction radiography.
    Güneri P; Göğüş S; Tuğsel Z; Boyacioğlu H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):484-9. PubMed ID: 18033945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system: an in vitro study.
    Dove SB; McDavid WD; Hamilton KE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Jun; 89(6):771-6. PubMed ID: 10846136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a novel digital subtraction technique for detecting subtle changes in jawbone density.
    Du Tré F; Jacobs R; Styven S; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2006 Sep; 10(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 16770624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital subtraction radiography evaluation of the bone repair process of chronic apical periodontitis after root canal treatment.
    Benfica e Silva J; Leles CR; Alencar AH; Nunes CA; Mendonça EF
    Int Endod J; 2010 Aug; 43(8):673-80. PubMed ID: 20491984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems.
    Oliveira AE; de Almeida SM; Paganini GA; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 11210259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A digital subtraction radiography investigation of upper first molar proximal bone density changes in adolescents.
    Ellwood R; Horner K; Alexander S; Davies R
    J Periodontal Res; 1998 Apr; 33(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 9651879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semiautomated image registration for digital subtraction radiography.
    Byrd V; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 9574960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A digital subtraction radiography scheme based on automatic multiresolution registration.
    Zacharaki EI; Matsopoulos GK; Asvestas PA; Nikita KS; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Nov; 33(6):379-90. PubMed ID: 15665232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Problems around the in vitro and in vivo application of quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Janssen PT; van Aken J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 May; 16(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 2656771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction.
    Miguens SA; Veeck EB; Fontanella VR; da Costa NP
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1500-3. PubMed ID: 19026882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro calibration and validation of a digital subtraction radiography system using scanned images.
    Woo BM; Zee KY; Chan FH; Corbet EF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Feb; 30(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 12622852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An observation of the healing process of periapical lesions by digital subtraction radiography.
    Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H; Sasaki T
    J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):589-91. PubMed ID: 12184420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.