These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9089921)
1. The role of access in explaining state abortion rates. Gober P Soc Sci Med; 1997 Apr; 44(7):1003-16. PubMed ID: 9089921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions. Haas-Wilson D J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion in the United States, 1977-1978. Forrest JD; Sullivan E; Tietze C Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(6):329-41. PubMed ID: 401078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public funding for abortion where broadly legal. Grossman D; Grindlay K; Burns B Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):453-460. PubMed ID: 27456713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion services in the United States, 1981 and 1982. Henshaw SK; Forrest JD; Blaine E Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(3):119-27. PubMed ID: 6468641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion in the United States, 1978-1979. Henshaw S; Forrest JD; Sullivan E; Tietze C Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(1):6-7, 10-8. PubMed ID: 7011839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characteristics of women obtaining induced abortions in selected low- and middle-income countries. Chae S; Desai S; Crowell M; Sedgh G; Singh S PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172976. PubMed ID: 28355285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. State abortion rates. The impact of policies, providers, politics, demographics, and economic environment. Blank RM; George CC; London RA J Health Econ; 1996 Oct; 15(5):513-53. PubMed ID: 10164042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion services in rural Washington State, 1983-1984 to 1993-1994: availability and outcomes. Dobie SA; Hart LG; Glusker A; Madigan D; Larson EH; Rosenblatt RA Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(5):241-5. PubMed ID: 10723649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion incidence and services in the United States, 1995-1996. Henshaw SK Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(6):263-70, 287. PubMed ID: 9859016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994. Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing the delivery of abortion services in Ontario: a descriptive study. Ferris LE; McMain-Klein M; Iron K Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 9635262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on the timing of abortion. Joyce T; Kaestner R Fam Plann Perspect; 2000; 32(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 10710701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Family planning issues relating to maternal and infant mortality in the United States. Puffer RR Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1993; 27(2):120-34. PubMed ID: 8339110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on abortions and births. Joyce T; Henshaw SK; Skatrud JD JAMA; 1997 Aug; 278(8):653-8. PubMed ID: 9272897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trends in rates of live births and abortions following state restrictions on public funding of abortion. Korenbrot CC; Brindis C; Priddy F Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(6):555-62. PubMed ID: 2124355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]