These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9089921)
21. State abortion policy, geographic access to abortion providers and changing family formation. Lichter DT; McLaughlin DK; Ribar DC Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(6):281-7. PubMed ID: 9859019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Community determinants of U.S. legal abortion rates. Borders JA; Cutright P Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 477925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Barriers around access to abortion experienced by rural women in New South Wales, Australia. Doran FM; Hornibrook J Rural Remote Health; 2016; 16(1):3538. PubMed ID: 26987999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Women's reproductive choices: the impact of Medicaid funding restrictions. Haas-Wilson D Fam Plann Perspect; 1997; 29(5):228-33. PubMed ID: 9323500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Abortion services in the United States, 1987 and 1988. Henshaw SK; Van Vort J Fam Plann Perspect; 1990; 22(3):102-8, 142. PubMed ID: 2379566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The accessibility of abortion services in the United States. Henshaw SK Fam Plann Perspect; 1991; 23(6):246-52, 263. PubMed ID: 1786805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sounding Board. Abortions in America: the effects of restrictive funding. Berger LR N Engl J Med; 1978 Jun; 298(26):1474-7. PubMed ID: 349392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. State abortion context and U.S. women's contraceptive choices, 1995-2010. Jacobs J; Stanfors M Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2015 Jun; 47(2):71-82. PubMed ID: 26095730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Estimates of demand for abortion among Soviet immigrants in Israel. Sabatello EF Stud Fam Plann; 1992; 23(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 1412599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. How are restrictive abortion statutes associated with unintended teen birth? Coles MS; Makino KK; Stanwood NL; Dozier A; Klein JD J Adolesc Health; 2010 Aug; 47(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 20638008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Abortion in the United States. Harper CC; Henderson JT; Darney PD Annu Rev Public Health; 2005; 26():501-12. PubMed ID: 15760299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Perceived Access to Abortion Among Women in the United States in 2018: Variation by State Abortion Policy Context. Perreira KM; Johnston EM; Shartzer A; Yin S Am J Public Health; 2020 Jul; 110(7):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 32437276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantifying disparities in access to public-sector abortion based on legislative differences within the Mexico City Metropolitan Area. Friedman J; Saavedra-Avendaño B; Schiavon R; Alexander L; Sanhueza P; Rios-Polanco R; Garcia-Martinez L; Darney BG Contraception; 2019 Mar; 99(3):160-164. PubMed ID: 30502328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. More family planning and abortion services needed. Gold R Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 12267090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Social, spatial and political determinants of U.S. abortion rates. Henry NF; Harvey ME Soc Sci Med; 1982; 16(9):987-96. PubMed ID: 7112177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The impact of state-level restrictions on abortion. Meier KJ; Haider-Markel DP; Stanislawski AJ; McFarlane DR Demography; 1996 Aug; 33(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 8875064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An economic interpretation of the distribution and organization of abortion services. Kay BJ; Whitted NA; Hardin SS Inquiry; 1981; 18(4):322-31. PubMed ID: 6460698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]